Neil Aurelio Nunes vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(SC) 103

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, A. S. BOPANNA
Neil Aurelio Nunes – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Subodh S. Patil, AOR Mr. Vivek Singh, AOR Mr. Ramesh Allanki, Adv. Mr. Vivek Singh, AOR
In W.P. (C) No. 961/2021 : Mr Arvind Datar, Sr Adv Dr Charu Mathur, AOR Ms Tanvi, Adv. Mr Sanjay Kumar Dubey, Adv. Mr Rahul Unnikrishnan, Adv. Mr Malak Bhatt, Adv.
In W.P.(C) No. 967/2021 Mr Arvind Datar, Sr Adv Dr Charu Mathur, AOR Ms Tanvi, Adv. Mr Sanjay Kumar Dubey, Adv Mr Rahul Unnikrishnan, Adv Mr Malak Bhatt, Adv.
In W.P.(C) No. 1105/2021 Dr Charu Mathur, AOR Ms Tanvi, Adv. Mr Sanjay Kumar Dubey, Adv.
For theRespondent(s): Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gaurav Sharma, AOR Mr. Kirtman Singh, Adv Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Adv. Mr. Dhawal Mohan, Adv Mr. Prateek Bhatia, Adv Ms. Srirupa Nag, Adv. Mr. Taha Yasin, Adv Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR Mr. R. Nedumaran, AOR Mr. A. Mariarputham, Sr. Adv. Mr. V. Krishnamurthy, Sr. Adv./AAG Dr. Joseph Aristotle S., AOR Mr. V. K. Biju, AOR Ms. Ria Sachthey, Adv. Mr. Chetanya Singh, Adv. Mr. Amlendu Kumar Akhilesh Kumar Jha, Adv. Mr. Shaji George, Adv. Ms. Vijay Laxmi, Adv. Ms. Archana Pathak Dave, AOR Mr. Kumar Prashant, Adv. Ms. Vanya Gupta, Adv. Mr. Avnish Dave, Adv. Mr. Parmod Kumar Vishnoi, Adv. Ms. Himanshi Shakya, Adv. Mr. Devashish Bharuka, AOR Mr. Mithu Jain, AOR Mr. Subodh S. Patil, AOR Mr. Shashank Ratnoo Adv. Mr. Vikram Hegde,AOR Mr. Shantanu Lakhotia, Adv.

Table of Content
1. introduction of obc reservation in aiq seats. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
2. arguments against obc reservation in aiq. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
3. court's analysis of merit vs. reservation. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
4. clarification on aiq seat allocation rules. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49)
5. executive power to introduce reservation. (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56)
6. court's judgment on the validity of obc reservation. (Para 57 , 58 , 59)
7. conclusion of the judgment. (Para 60 , 61)

Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J.

A.	Factual Background	3
B.	Pendency of the Writ Petition Instituted by Saloni Kumari	10
C.	Submissions of Counsel	11
D.	Analysis	18
D.1	The Merit of Reservation	18
D.2	The Court and the AIQ seats	39
D.3	The Executive’s power to introduce reservation in AIQ seats	59
D.4	Changing the Rules of the Game	61
E.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(SC) 103

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, A. S. BOPANNANeil Aurelio Nunes – AppellantVersusUnion of India – Respondent

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, A. S. BOPANNA
Neil Aurelio Nunes – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent