Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
M/s.Hi Tech Print Systems – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of Customs (Chennai II) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek provisional release of detained goods. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. court follows previous decisions for consistency. (Para 4) |
| 3. customs directed to release goods under certain conditions. (Para 5) |
| 4. no costs awarded in the proceedings. (Para 6) |
ORDER
In all these writ petitions, a direction is sought for to direct the respondents 1 to 3 herein to forthwith allow the Provisional Release of the goods (Second hand Highly Specialized Equipments - Digital Multifunction Print & Copying Machines), imported by the respective petitioners, covered under the Bills of Entries mentioned in the prayer to each of these writ petitions.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the respondents.
3. The respective petitioners have imported Second hand Highly Specialized Equipments - Digital Multifunction Print & Copying Devices (MFDs herinafter) and their goods have been detained by the Customs Department for non-production of a).Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) certificate and b).Authorization from the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT). They seek for Provisional Release of the MFDs through these writ petitions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
