THE CUSTOMS ACT, 1962
THE CUSTOMS ACT, 1962
Act No. 52 of 1962
1st February, 1963
An Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to Customs.
Read full Act(1) This Act may be called the Customs Act, 1962.
(2) It extends to the whole of India and, save as otherwise provided in this Act, it applies also to any offence or contravention thereunder committed outside India by any person.
(3) It shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint.
In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires—
(Full definitions continue as per the Act, formatted in paragraphs where appropriate.)
Legal Comments
"Introduction" - The Customs Act, 1962 governs import/export and anti-smuggling measures; Section 2 lays foundational definitions critical for interpreting subsequent sections and penalties. [Union Of India VS Umosh Dhaimode - 1997 0 Supreme(SC) 262]
"What Section Says" - Section 2( denomination ) provides definitions (e.g., import, export, goods, etc.) that shape offences and enforceability under the Act; without precise definitions, enforcement and penalties would be uncertain. Note: multiple sources cite Section 2 definitions as frame for later provisions. [E. S. I. LTD. VS UNION OF INDIA (UOI) - 2002 0 Supreme(Cal) 274], [02100128716]
"Essential ingredients" - Offences under the Act require acts like smuggling, improper import/export, or violation of prohibitions; mens rea is not always essential for penalties (e.g., Section 112 penalizes acts in relation to goods confiscated under Section 111). [Collector Of Customs VS James David Crighton - 1975 0 Supreme(Cal) 312], [Collector Of Customs VS James David Crighton - 1975 0 Supreme(Cal) 312]
"Scope of Section" - Section 2 applies across the Act, informing definitions used in Sections such as 110 (seizure), 124 (notice), 111/112 (confiscation/penalty), and 125 (option to pay fine); its breadth impacts jurisdiction and procedure. [Collector Of Customs VS James David Crighton - 1975 0 Supreme(Cal) 312], [UNITED NEWS OF INDIA VS UNION OF INDIA - 2004 0 Supreme(Del) 63]
"Punishment for Section" - Penalties under the Act are tiered (e.g., Section 112 for penalties on improper import/export; Section 114 for attempts; redemption fines under 125; penalties tied to value and nature of violation). Courts have interpreted liability (including where mens rea is not required) and quantum. [Collector Of Customs VS James David Crighton - 1975 0 Supreme(Cal) 312], [01100140911], [Jayanthilal Mangldas VS Commissioner of Customs (Sea), Chennai - Customs, Excise And Gold Appellate Tribunal (2001)]
"Anticipatory bail relevance" - Anticipatory bail can extend to Customs Act offences under CrPC Section 438 where appropriate, balancing liberty with investigation; applicable principles mirror general anticipatory bail jurisprudence. [E. Joseph and Another VS Assistant Collector of Customs, Tuticorin - 1981 0 Supreme(Mad) 365], [03300007011]
"Seizure vs Detention distinction" - Courts distinguish detention versus seizure for six-month show-cause deadlines under Section 110(2); correct classification affects validity of subsequent proceedings and remedy to return goods. [E. S. I. LTD. VS UNION OF INDIA (UOI) - 2002 0 Supreme(Cal) 274], [Sri Dilip Kumar Dey VS Union of India - 1993 0 Supreme(Cal) 424]
"Notice requirements" - Section 124 requires giving notice to owner before confiscation; failure to provide notice or improper service can render confiscation/quashing orders, or require return of goods. [Dewasa Trading VS Collector Of Customs - 1991 0 Supreme(Cal) 132], [P. Bhoormal Tirupati VS The Additional Collector of Customs Customs House, Madras-1. - 1973 0 Supreme(Mad) 440]
"Burden of proof and process" - In certain contexts, the department bears burden to establish smuggling or misdescription; misdeclaration, burden shifting, and natural justice concerns can lead to quashing or remand. [RAM KISHAN AGARWALA VS COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS - 1979 0 Supreme(Ori) 96], [00900012443]
"Promissory estoppel implications" - Government notifications under Section 25 may attract promissory estoppel; exemptions or reductions based on such notifications can be reversed only in light of public interest and equitable principles. [ORISSA CEMENT LTD. VS SUPERINTENDENT, CUSTOMS AND C. EX. - 1992 0 Supreme(Ori) 302], [UNION OF INDIA VS INDIAN RAYON AND INDUSTRIES LTD. - 1999 0 Supreme(Cal) 660]
"Jurisdictional reach" - Jurisdiction for adjudication may travel across tribunals and collectors; situs of seizure vs. situs of import, and cross-jurisdiction imports require careful analysis of which collector/authority can adjudicate. [Flextronics Technologies (India) Private Limited rep by its Managing Director, Kancheepuram District VS State of Tamil Nadu rep by the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Kancheepuram - 2016 0 Supreme(Mad) 1328], [B. N. Sharma VS Collector of Central Excise, Madras - 1970 0 Supreme(Mad) 105]
"Promissory estoppel applicability to exemptions" - Courts have held that promissory estoppel applies to government exemptions granted under Section 25, requiring refund or non-recovery where relied upon by importers. [ORISSA CEMENT LTD. VS SUPERINTENDENT, CUSTOMS AND C. EX. - 1992 0 Supreme(Ori) 302], [UNION OF INDIA VS INDIAN RAYON AND INDUSTRIES LTD. - 1999 0 Supreme(Cal) 660]
"Right to hearing and natural justice" - Adequate opportunity to be heard (including disclosure of relied statements) is essential; defective show-cause notices or lack of particulars can invalidate penalties or confiscations. [Devi Chand VS Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad, A. P. - 1965 0 Supreme(AP) 23], [GOVINDA RAM JALAN VS BHOLANATH PAL - 2001 0 Supreme(Cal) 485]
"Confinement of liability to conveyances" - Section 115(2) and related provisions create specific rules for confiscation of vessels/conveyances; Section 110(2) demonstrates procedural timing, while Section 115 governs conveyance-specific action. [Union of India and another VS Mackinnon Mackenzie and Co. Ltd - 1994 0 Supreme(Bom) 661], [NAZIR GUUM SAHBB BADDI VS D. G. MUGWB - 1972 0 Supreme(Bom) 125]
"Anticipatory bail in customs offences" - Where facts show weak connection to seizures or foisting, anticipatory bail under CrPC 438 may be granted subject to conditions; demonstrates balancing of precautionary freedoms with investigation needs. [E. Joseph and Another VS Assistant Collector of Customs, Tuticorin - 1981 0 Supreme(Mad) 365], [03300007011]
"Penalty computation and exemptions" - Penalties under Section 112 or 114 are sensitive to whether goods were prohibited, smuggled, or misdeclared; exemptions under Section 25 or 28 depend on accurate assessment and whether duty was actually payable. [Collector Of Customs VS James David Crighton - 1975 0 Supreme(Cal) 312], [UNION OF INDIA VS INDIA STEAMSHIP CO. LTD. - 2003 0 Supreme(Cal) 356]
"Import/export prohibition and notification validity" - Notifications under Section 11 or 11(1) require specificity; blanket prohibitions are scrutinized for compliance with statutory language; court may strike or enforce based on express language. [BIRD AND CO. (PRIVATE) LTD. VS ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS FOR EXPORT, CALCUTTA - 1970 0 Supreme(Cal) 102], [SANKARLAL SARAF VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - 1985 0 Supreme(Cal) 260]
"Assistance and agency responsibility" - Inspection/exam agencies owe duties to certify that consignments do not include prohibited materials; mis-certification can lead to adverse consequences for importers and require corrective action. [Polytech Trade Foundation vs Union of India - Delhi (2021)], [Rannu Devi vs Chairman, Central Board of Excise and Customes - Delhi (2014)]
"Remand and reassessment powers" - Appellate authorities and tribunals have remand powers under Section 128(2) and 130; remand decisions depend on jurisdictional questions and finality of adjudications. [Union Of India VS Umosh Dhaimode - 1997 0 Supreme(SC) 262], [Reva Electric Car Pvt. Ltd. VS Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore-I - 2011 0 Supreme(Kar) 897]
"Refunds and interest on refunds" - Refunds of duty and interest are governed by Section 22(1)(A) and related provisions; courts sometimes award interest from dates of favorable orders, reflecting on unjust enrichment and timing. [SANKARLAL SARAF VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - 1985 0 Supreme(Cal) 260], [RADHESHYAM TULSIAN VS COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS - 1987 0 Supreme(Cal) 71]
"Confiscation and return of goods" - If show-cause or confiscation orders are invalid due to procedural issues, courts may direct return of seized goods and remand for fresh adjudication; this preserves property rights until due process is satisfied. [Dewasa Trading VS Collector Of Customs - 1991 0 Supreme(Cal) 132], [C. Mani (A-1) VS Saleem - 1989 0 Supreme(Mad) 97]
"Cross-cutting jurisprudence on penalties" - Several cases emphasize that penalties under Sections 112, 114, and 125 must adhere to statutory prescriptions, and tribunals cannot exercise unbounded discretion; due process and statutory mandates guide quantum and form of action. [Shashi International VS Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi - Custom Excise And Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (2008)], [B. N. Sharma VS Collector of Central Excise, Madras - 1970 0 Supreme(Mad) 105]
"Statutory interpretation approach" - Indian courts repeatedly rely on textual, purposive, and contextual interpretation of Sections 2, 110, 124, 125, and 142 to resolve issues of jurisdiction, service, and remedy; consistency across decisions aids predictability. [E. S. I. LTD. VS UNION OF INDIA (UOI) - 2002 0 Supreme(Cal) 274], [Sri Dilip Kumar Dey VS Union of India - 1993 0 Supreme(Cal) 424]
"Limitations of jurisdiction for show-cause notices" - Proper issuance within statutory windows (e.g., six months from seizure) is essential; failure leads to remedy for owners and potential quashing of orders. [Collector Of Customs VS James David Crighton - 1975 0 Supreme(Cal) 312], [02100118422]
"Summary takeaway" - Section 2 provides the definitional backbone for the Customs Act; understanding its breadth is crucial to interpret who can be penalized, what constitutes seizure, and how procedural safeguards govern the confiscation and penalties framework. [E. Joseph and Another VS Assistant Collector of Customs, Tuticorin - 1981 0 Supreme(Mad) 365], [E. S. I. LTD. VS UNION OF INDIA (UOI) - 2002 0 Supreme(Cal) 274]
There shall be the following classes of officers of customs, namely:—
(1) The Board may appoint such persons as it thinks fit to be officers of customs.
(2) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (1), Board may authorise a Principal Chief Commissioner of Customs or Chief Commissioner of Customs or a Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs or a Joint or Assistant Commissioner of Customs or Deputy Commissioner of Customs to appoint officers of customs below the rank of Assistant Commissioner of Customs or Deputy Commissioner of Customs.
(1) Subject to such conditions and limitations as the Board may impose, an officer of customs may exercise the powers and discharge the duties conferred or imposed on him under this Act.
(2) An officer of customs may exercise the powers and discharge the duties conferred or imposed under this Act on any other officer of customs who is subordinate to him.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in this section, a Commissioner (Appeals) shall not exercise the powers and discharge the duties conferred or imposed on an officer of customs other than those specified in Chapter XV and section 108.
The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, entrust either conditionally or unconditionally to any officer of the Central or the State Government or a local authority any functions of the Board or any officer of customs under this Act.
(1) The Board may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint—
The Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs may,—
Omitted by The Finance Act, 2016 (28 of 2016), s. 118 (w.e.f. 14-5-2016).
The Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint, in or near any customs port, a boarding station for the purpose of boarding of, or disembarkation from, vessels by officers of customs.
(1) If the Central Government is satisfied that it is necessary so to do for any of the purposes specified in sub-section (2), it may, by notification in the Official Gazette, prohibit either absolutely or subject to such conditions (to be fulfilled before or after clearance) as may be specified in the notification, the import or export of goods of any specified description.
(2) The purposes referred to in sub-section (1) are the following:—
In this Chapter, unless the context otherwise requires,—
Legal Comments
Introduction - Section 11A of the Customs Act, 1962 creates a regime for recovery of duties not levied or short-levied, with extended periods in cases of fraud, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts or collusion; the proviso extends limitation from six months to five years. [Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangabad VS Bajaj Auto Ltd. , Waluj, Aurangabad, through its Vice President (Materials) - 2010 7 Supreme 634]
Nature of Section 11A - 11A operates as a penal provision governing proceedings for recovery where duty has not been levied or paid, or short-levied/short-paid or erroneously refunded. It is applied through show-cause notices and adjudication, with strict compliance to the statutory framework. [VISHNU KUMAR VS COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS NEW DELHI - 2010 0 Supreme(Del) 420?; Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangabad VS Bajaj Auto Ltd. , Waluj, Aurangabad, through its Vice President (Materials) - 2010 7 Supreme 634]
Proviso focus - The extended period (five years) requires proof of fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts by the importer/exporter or their agent; without such, the normal six-month period governs. [Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangabad VS Bajaj Auto Ltd. , Waluj, Aurangabad, through its Vice President (Materials) - 2010 7 Supreme 634]
Burden-shifting - Initial burden rests on the department to show the proviso scenario; once established, the burden shifts to the assessee to rebut or justify. [Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangabad VS Bajaj Auto Ltd. , Waluj, Aurangabad, through its Vice President (Materials) - 2010 7 Supreme 634]
Interplay with other statutes - Section 28 (Customs Act) and Section 11A (Central Excise Act) are read in parallelish fashion in several judgments; however, there are nuanced textual differences (e.g., "intent to evade payment of duty" in 11A proviso) that affect application. [Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs VS Shabnam Synthethcs - 2017 0 Supreme(Guj) 167]; [Gulam Husain VS Customs and Central Excise Deptt. - 1991 0 Supreme(Raj) 608]
Scope of 11A proceedings - 11A proceedings concern recovery of duties not levied or short-levied, including interest and penalties, and can extend to those cases where there was an erroneous refund, subject to the proviso. [Commissioner of Customs (Air) Custom House VS P. Sinnasamy - 2016 0 Supreme(Mad) 2729; Kasturi & Sons Ltd. , having registered office rep. By its Principal Officer and General Manager VS The State Trading Corporation of India Limited having registered office - 2008 0 Supreme(Mad) 2427]
Limitation and finality - Jurisprudence emphasizes adherence to time limits for 11A notices; where proceedings linger beyond reasonable periods without justification, courts have quashed or remitted for fresh, timely adjudication. [National Industries VS Assistant Collector of Customs, Madras - 1979 0 Supreme(Mad) 398]; [Commissioner of Central Excise, Madurai VS SUPDTG. Engineer, TNEB - Custom Excise And Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (2006)]
Related constitutional dimensions - Several decisions stress that enforceability must respect due process, natural justice and show-cause boundaries (no penalty beyond scope of SCN; no revocation of extant orders without proper procedures). [Associated Switch Gears and Projects Ltd. Through Its Director, Jawahar Lal Jain VS State of U. P. - 2024 0 Supreme(All) 130]; [P. GANESH, COMMERCIAL DIRECTOR VS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE - 2018 0 Supreme(Mad) 3801]
Provisional release and attachment - In provisional-release contexts under 11A (and analogous 28), courts require that discretion be exercised with reason, relevance and adherence to parameters, including the conditions for release and deposit. [Malabar Diamond Gallery Pvt. Ltd. VS Additional Director General Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Chennai Zonal Unit - 2016 0 Supreme(Mad) 2331?; 02100026062]
Import of “goods” and valuation nexus - While not directly in 11A, cases concerning “goods” definitions, imports via courier, and valuation under Customs Tariff Act often inform 11A context, particularly where duty is contested on grounds of mis-declaration or under-valuation. [Associated Cement Company LTD. VS Commissioner Of Customs - 2001 1 Supreme 380]; [COSMOS IMPEX (INDIA) PVT. LTD. VS PURANCHAND RAMSHARAN TANK - Consumer (2014)]
Prohibition and illegal import framework - Section 11A is anchored in the larger structure of Sections 11, 11A, 12, 14, 28, and 28A; illegality or prohibition in import (e.g., under FTDR Act) can trigger penalties and confiscation alongside 11A remedies. [Commissioner of Customs (Air) Custom House VS P. Sinnasamy - 2016 0 Supreme(Mad) 2729]; [Abdul Hussain Saifuddin Hamid VS State Of Gujarat - 2020 0 Supreme(Guj) 851]
Jurisdictional notes - Several matters touch on which authorities adjudicate under 11A (Collector vs. Addl. Collector) and the implications of Board/circular guidance; consistency with Board circulars is binding unless overridden by law. [VISHNU KUMAR VS COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS NEW DELHI - 2010 0 Supreme(Del) 420]; [South India Exports & Others VS The Joint Director of Foreign Trade & Another - 2003 0 Supreme(Mad) 782]
Double jeopardy concerns - In some contexts, 11A actions are framed as remedial rather than prosecutorial; the encrusting question of double jeopardy arises when enquiry/examination overlaps with criminal prosecutions, but courts distinguish civil-administrative recoveries from prosecutions. [Kamaluddin Mohd. Amin Siddique VS N. F. Chwda - Crimes (1989)]
Natural justice and SCN scope - Courts consistently require SCN to reflect the precise grounds and the law relied upon; exceeding ground or introducing new grounds on adjudication undermines natural justice. [Associated Switch Gears and Projects Ltd. Through Its Director, Jawahar Lal Jain VS State of U. P. - 2024 0 Supreme(All) 130]
Proviso interplay with “intent” - The presence of intent to evade is a critical factor; however, the Supreme Court has cautioned that the meaning of wilful misstatement/suppression in 11A must be read with intent to evade, distinguishing mere non-declaration from wilful acts. [Vimal Narain VS State of Rajasthan - 1997 0 Supreme(Raj) 1496]; [Universal Polysack India Pvt. Ltd. VS Union of India - 2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 3015]
Remand and de novo adjudication - Where prior adjudication is flawed, courts have remanded for fresh consideration, especially where the original decision did not properly address the grounds or where show-cause was defective. [Union of India Rep. by The Senior Intelligence Officer, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Chennai VS State represented by The Inspector of Police, Chennai - 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 635]
Article 226/Constitutional angle - Writ petitions frequently invoke Article 226 to challenge show-cause notices on grounds of jurisdiction, natural justice, or limitation; courts may quash or direct fresh proceedings in fit cases. [Associated Switch Gears and Projects Ltd. Through Its Director, Jawahar Lal Jain VS State of U. P. - 2024 0 Supreme(All) 130]; [02100026062]
Key takeaway from precedents - A disciplined structure of 11A requires timely, grounds-based notices; beyond-six-month extended periods demand clear, corroborated proof of fraud/plan to evade; otherwise, recovery actions must be timely and procedurally correct. [Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangabad VS Bajaj Auto Ltd. , Waluj, Aurangabad, through its Vice President (Materials) - 2010 7 Supreme 634]; [National Industries VS Assistant Collector of Customs, Madras - 1979 0 Supreme(Mad) 398]
Essential ingredients (summary) - Duty not levied/paid or short-levied or short-paid; grounds for invoking extended period (fraud, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts, collusion); department bears initial burden; adjudication through proper SCN; potential for penalties/interest; potential for fresh adjudication on remand if defects exist. [Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangabad VS Bajaj Auto Ltd. , Waluj, Aurangabad, through its Vice President (Materials) - 2010 7 Supreme 634]
Punishment spectrum (summary) - 11A/Section 28-based actions may result in recovery of differential duty, interest, penalties; in some cases, refunds or revocations may accompany orders; in some instances, contempt of due process may lead to quashing SCN. [Commissioner of Customs (Air) Custom House VS P. Sinnasamy - 2016 0 Supreme(Mad) 2729]; [Aurobindo Pharma Limited VS Assistant Commissioner, Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax - 2014 0 Supreme(AP) 576]
Proportionality and fairness - Courts emphasize that the extended period should not be invoked where no culpable state of mind can be shown; the standard is “intent to evade” and “wilful suppression.” [Vimal Narain VS State of Rajasthan - 1997 0 Supreme(Raj) 1496]
Cross-border import and valuation nuance - Where goods involve intellectual inputs or technologically enhanced final products, the valuation and duty might be adjusted under concomitant rules (valuation, tariff chapters) and thereby influence 11A proceedings in cases with mis-declaration or concealment. [Glamstone Cosmetics Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India - 2026 0 Supreme(Bom) 359]; [COSMOS IMPEX (INDIA) PVT. LTD. VS PURANCHAND RAMSHARAN TANK - Consumer (2014)]
Final practical note - When drafting 11A notices, ensure precise statutory references, specific grounds, factual basis for fraud/misstatement/suppression, and a defined relevant date, to withstand judicial scrutiny and respect due process. [VISHNU KUMAR VS COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS NEW DELHI - 2010 0 Supreme(Del) 420]; [Associated Switch Gears and Projects Ltd. Through Its Director, Jawahar Lal Jain VS State of U. P. - 2024 0 Supreme(All) 130]
If, having regard to the magnitude of the illegal import of goods of any class or description, the Central Government is satisfied that it is expedient in the public interest to take special measures for the purpose of checking the illegal import, circulation or disposal of such goods, or facilitating the detection of such goods, it may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify goods of such class or description.
(1) Every person who owns, possesses or controls, on the notified date, any notified goods, shall, within seven days from that date, deliver to the proper officer a statement (in such form, in such manner and containing such particulars as may be specified by rules made in this behalf) in relation to the notified goods owned, possessed or controlled by him and the place where such goods are kept or stored.
(2) Every person who acquires, after the notified date, any notified goods, shall, before making such acquisition, deliver to the proper officer an intimation containing the particulars of the place where such goods are proposed to be kept or stored after such acquisition and shall, immediately on such acquisition, deliver to the proper officer a statement (in such form, in such manner and containing such particulars as may be specified by rules made in this behalf) in relation to the notified goods acquired by him:
Provided that a person who has delivered a statemen
No person shall acquire (except by gift or succession, from any other individual in India), after the notified date, any notified goods—
(1) Every person who, on or after the notified date, owns, possesses, controls or acquires any notified goods shall maintain (in such form and in such manner as may be specified by rules made in this behalf) a true and complete account of such goods and shall, as often as he acquires or parts with any notified goods, make an entry in the said account in relation to such acquisition or parting with, and shall also state therein the particulars of the person from whom such goods have been acquired or in whose favour such goods have been parted with, as the case may be, and such account shall be kept, along with the goods, at the place of storage of the notified goods to which such accounts relate:
Provided that it shall not be necessary to maintain separately accounts in the form and manner specified by rules made in this behalf in the case of a person who is already maintaining accounts which contain the particulars specified by the said rules.
(2) Every person who owns
On and from the notified date, no person shall sell or otherwise transfer any notified goods, unless every transaction in relation to the sale or transfer of such goods is evidenced by a voucher in such form and containing such particulars as may be specified by rules made in this behalf.
(1) Nothing in sections 11C, 11E and 11F shall apply to any notified goods which are—
(2) If any person, who is in possession of any notified goods referred to in sub-section (1), sells, or otherwise transfers for a valuable consideration, any such goods, he shall issue to the purchaser or transferee, as the case may be, a memorandum containing such particulars as may be specified by rules made in this behalf and no such goods shall be taken from one place to another unless they are accompanied by the said memorandum.
In this Chapter, unless the context otherwise requires,—
If, having regard to the magnitude of the illegal export of goods of any class or description, the Central Government is satisfied that it is expedient in the public interest to take special measures for the purpose of checking the illegal export or facilitating the detection of goods which are likely to be illegally exported, it may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify goods of such class or description.
(1) Every person who owns, possesses or controls, on the specified date, any specified goods, the market price of which exceeds fifteen thousand rupees shall, within seven days from that date, deliver to the proper officer an intimation containing the particulars of the place where such goods are kept or stored within the specified area.
(2) Every person who acquires (within the specified area), after the specified date, any specified goods,—
(1) No specified goods shall be transported from, into or within any specified area or loaded on any animal or conveyance in such area, unless they are accompanied by a transport voucher (in such form and containing such particulars as may be specified by rules made in this behalf) prepared by the person owning, possessing, controlling or selling such goods:
Provided that no transport voucher shall be necessary for the transport, within a village, town or city, of any specified goods the market price of which, on the date of transport, does not exceed one thousand rupees.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where the Central Government, after considering the nature of any specified goods, the time, mode, route and the market price of the goods intended to be transported, the purpose of the transportation and the vulnerability of the specified area with regard to the illegal export of such goods, is satisfied that it is expedient in the public int
(1) Every person who, on or after the specified date, owns, possesses or controls, within a specified area, any specified goods of a market price exceeding fifteen thousand rupees, shall maintain (in such form and in such manner as may be specified by rules made in this behalf) a true and complete account of such goods and shall, as often as he acquires or parts with any specified goods, make an entry in the said account in relation to such acquisition or parting with, and shall also state therein the particulars of the person from whom such goods have been acquired or in whose favour such goods have been parted with, as the case may be, and such account shall be kept, along with the goods, at the place of storage of the specified goods to which such accounts relate:
Provided that it shall not be necessary to maintain separately accounts in the form and manner specified by rules made in this behalf in the case of a person who is already maintaining accounts which contain the
Except where he receives payment by cheque drawn by the purchaser, every person who sells or otherwise transfers within any specified area, any specified goods, shall obtain, on his copy of the sale or transfer voucher, the signature and full postal address of the person to whom such sale or transfer is made and shall also take such other reasonable steps as may be specified by rules made in this behalf to satisfy himself as to the identity of the purchaser or the transferee, as the case may be, and if after an inquiry made by a proper officer, it is found that the purchaser or the transferee, as the case may be, is not either readily traceable or is a fictitious person, it shall be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, that such goods have been illegally exported and the person who had sold or otherwise transferred such goods had been concerned in such illegal export:
Provided that nothing in this section shall apply to petty sales of any specified goods if the aggregate
If the Central Government is satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, it may, by notification in the Official Gazette, exempt generally, either absolutely or subject to such conditions as may be specified in the notification, goods of any class or description from all or any of the provisions of Chapter IVA or Chapter IVB.
(1) Except as otherwise provided in this Act, or any other law for the time being in force, duties of customs shall be levied at such rates as may be specified under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), or any other law for the time being in force, on goods imported into, or exported from, India.
(2) The provisions of sub-section (1) shall apply in respect of all goods belonging to Government as they apply in respect of goods not belonging to Government.
If any imported goods are pilfered after the unloading thereof and before the proper officer has made an order for clearance for home consumption or deposit in a warehouse, the importer shall not be liable to pay the duty leviable on such goods except where such goods are restored to the importer after pilferage.
(1) For the purposes of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), or any other law for the time being in force, the value of the imported goods and export goods shall be the transaction value of such goods, that is to say, the price actually paid or payable for the goods when sold for export to India for delivery at the time and place of importation, or as the case may be, for export from India for delivery at the time and place of exportation, where the buyer and seller of the goods are not related and price is the sole consideration for the sale subject to such other conditions as may be specified in the rules made in this behalf:
Provided that such transaction value in the case of imported goods shall include, in addition to the price as aforesaid, any amount paid or payable for costs and services, including commissions and brokerage, engineering, design work, royalties and licence fees, costs of transportation to the place of importation, insurance, loading, unloading an
(1) The rate of duty and tariff valuation, if any, applicable to any imported goods, shall be the rate and valuation in force,
(2) The provisions of this section shall not apply to baggage and goods imported by post.
The rate of duty and tariff valuation, if any, applicable to any export goods, shall be the rate and valuation in force,—
(2) The provisions of this section shall not apply to baggage and goods exported by post.
(1) An importer entering any imported goods under section 46, or an exporter entering any export goods under section 50, shall, save as otherwise provided in section 85, self-assess the duty, if any, leviable on such goods.
(2) The proper officer may verify the entries made under section 46 or section 50 and the self-assessment of goods referred to in sub-section (1) and for this purpose, examine or test any imported goods or export goods or such part thereof as may be necessary.
Provided that the selection of cases for verification shall primarily be on the basis of risk evaluation through appropriate selection criteria.
For the purposes of verification under sub-section (2), the proper officer may require the importer, exporter or any other person to produce any document or information, whereby the duty leviable on the imported goods or export goods, as the case may be, can be ascertained and thereupon, the importer, exporter or such other person shall produce
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act but without prejudice to the provisions of section 46 and section 50,—
the proper officer may direct that the duty leviable on such goods be assessed provisionally if the importer or the exporter, as the case may be, furnishes such security as the prop
Except as otherwise provided in any law for the time being in force, where goods consist of a set of articles, duty shall be calculated as follows:—
Provided that, —
If goods are imported into India after exportation therefrom, such goods shall be liable to duty and be subject to all the conditions and restrictions, if any, to which goods of the like kind and value are liable or subject, on the importation thereof.
All goods, derelict, jetsam, flotsam and wreck brought or coming into India, shall be dealt with as if they were imported into India, unless it be shown to the satisfaction of the proper officer that they are entitled to be admitted duty-free under this Act.
(1) Where it is shown to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner of Customs or Deputy Commissioner of Customs—
such goods shall be chargeable to duty in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (2).
(2) The duty to be charged on the goods referred to in sub-section (1) shall bear the same proportio
(1) Without prejudice to the provisions of section 13, where it is shown to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner of Customs or Deputy Commissioner of Customs that any imported goods have been lost (otherwise than as a result of pilferage) or destroyed, at any time before clearance for home consumption, the Assistant Commissioner of Customs or Deputy Commissioner of Customs shall remit the duty on such goods.
(2) The owner of any imported goods may, at any time before an order for clearance of goods for home consumption under section 47 or an order for permitting the deposit of goods in a warehouse under section 60 has been made, relinquish his title to the goods and thereupon he shall not be liable to pay the duty thereon;
Provided that the owner of any such imported goods shall not be allowed to relinquish his title to such goods regarding which an offence appears to have been committed under this Act or any other law for the time being in force.
The Central Government may make rules for permitting at the request of the owner the denaturing or mutilation of imported goods which are ordinarily used for more than one purpose so as to render them unfit for one or more of such purposes; and where any goods are so denatured or mutilated they shall be chargeable to duty at such rate as would be applicable if the goods had been imported in the denatured or mutilated form.
(1) If the Central Government is satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, it may, by notification in the Official Gazette, exempt generally either absolutely or subject to such conditions (to be fulfilled before or after clearance) as may be specified in the notification goods of any specified description from the whole or any part of duty of customs leviable thereon.
If the Central Government is satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, it may, by special order in each case, exempt from the payment of duty, under circumstances of an exceptional nature to be stated in such order, any goods on which duty is leviable.
The Central Government may, if it considers it necessary or expedient so to do for the purpose of clarifying the scope or applicability of any notification issued under sub-section (1) or order issued under sub-section (2), insert an explanation in such notification or order, as the case may be, by notification i
Where the Central Government is satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, it may, by notification, exempt such of the goods which are imported for the purposes of repair, further processing or manufacture, as may be specified therein, from the whole or any part of duty of customs leviable thereon, subject to the following conditions, namely:—
Notwithstanding anything contained in section 20, where the Central Government is satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, it may, by notification, exempt such of the goods which are re-imported after being exported for the purposes of repair, further processing or manufacture, as may be specified therein, from the whole or any part of duty of customs leviable thereon, subject to the following conditions, namely:—
Where on the exportation of any goods any duty has been paid, such duty shall be refunded to the person by whom or on whose behalf it was paid, if —
(1) Where on the importation of any goods capable of being easily identified as such imported goods, any duty has been paid on clearance of such goods for home consumption, such duty shall be refunded to the person by whom or on whose behalf it was paid, if—
If any difficulty arises in giving effect to the provisions of this Act, particularly in relation to the transition from the enactments repealed by this Act to the provisions of this Act, the Central Government may, by general or special order, do anything not inconsistent with such provisions which appears to be necessary or expedient for the purpose of removing the difficulty.
Elevate your legal practice with advanced AI-driven research and drafting solutions. Experience unmatched efficiency, precision, and security, tailored exclusively for legal professionals.