Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J
Shanthi – Appellant
Versus
Varudhappa Gounder (Died) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of appeal suit. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. plaintiff's claim for partition. (Para 3) |
| 3. defendants' written statement. (Para 4) |
| 4. framing of issues by judge. (Para 5) |
| 5. trial and evidence recording. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 6. appellant's arguments and legal basis. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 7. respondent's arguments on property distribution. (Para 11 , 14) |
| 8. assertions regarding property ownership. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 9. legal framework affecting the judgment. (Para 22 , 26 , 29) |
| 10. final ruling of the court. (Para 30 , 31) |
JUDGMENT
This Appeal Suit has been filed to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 31.10.2014 made in O.S.No.172 of 2012 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge, Namakkal.
2. The Plaintiff in O.S.No.172 of 2012 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge, Namakkal is the Appellant in this Appeal. The Plaintiff is the daughter of the first Defendant. The Plaintiff had filed the Suit for partition and separate possession of her 1/3rd share in the Suit Items 1 to 4 of the schedule mentioned properties.
3. The brief facts, which are necessary for considering the Appeal Suit, are as follows:-
3.1. The Plaintiff is the daughter of the first Defendant through t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
