Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.BALAJI, J
Bharat Kumar K.Shah – Appellant
Versus
Shri Vallabhacharya Vidya Sabha, Madras Rep. by its Secretary Manoj Kumar Sonthalia – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial procedural background of the case and introduction of key issues. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented by legal counsels concerning procedural integrity. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. court's observations on the validity of reopening cases post cross-examination. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. emphasis on the court's discretion in evidence management. (Para 15 , 20) |
| 5. conclusion and dismissal of the case. (Para 25 , 26) |
-
COMMON ORDER
These revisions have been filed by the plaintiff in O.S.No.5150 of 2020, challenging the orders in I.A.Nos.1, 2 and 3 of 2022, in and whereby, the plaintiff sought for receiving additional documents on the side of the plaintiff, recall P.W.1 and to reopen the evidence of P.W.1.
2.I have heard Mr.R.Thiagarajan, learned counsel for the revision petitioner, Mr.S.Vijayaraghavan, learned counsel for the 1st respondent, Mr.K.Shakespeare, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent, Mr.Babu Rangasamy, learned counsel for the 4th respondent, Mrs.A.Shabnam Banu, learned counsel for the 7th respondent and Mr.Akhil Abkar Ali, learned Standing Counsel (CMDA) for the 6th respondent in all the revisions.
3.Mr.R.Thiagarajan, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
