SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 67317

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice M.JOTHIRAMAN
M.KAMARAJ – Appellant
Versus
M.SUDHEER – Respondent


ORDER

The unsuccessful plaintiff has preferred this Civil Revision Petition.Originally the plaintiff / M.Kamaraj has filed a Civil Suit in O.S.No.2267 of 2020 before this Court for recovery of money. The defendant / respondent herein filed leave to defend application in A.No.1172 of 2018. The learned Master passed a conditional order dated 22.03.2018 directing to furnish security for Rs.30,00,000/-. The aforesaid order was not complied by the defendant and the learned Master dismissed the said application on 26.04.2018 and decreed the Suit.

2. The defendant has preferred a Civil Revision Petition in C.R.P.No.505 of2023 before this Court against the order passed by the Court below in I.A.No.6 of 2023 in O.S.No.2267 of 2020 and the same was allowed and the Court below was directed to receive a Pen Drive along with Section 65B Certificate, vide order dated 09.03.2023. At this juncture, the plaintiff has filed a petition in I.A.No.7 of 2023 in O.S.No.2267 of 2020 under Order XIII Rule 3 CPC not to permit the defendant to mark the pen drive along with certificate under Section 65B of the Evidence Act, without production of original as the same is inadmissible. Upon considering the arg

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top