SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 55459

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.Swaminathan, J
Mohamed Harish – Appellant
Versus
The Sub Registrar, O/o.the Sub Registrar Office, Ramnagar, Devakottai, Sivagangai District – Respondent
W.P.(MD)No.23879 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.H.Mohammed Imran, for M/s.Ajmal Associates
For the Respondents: Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Additional Government Pleader

A Muslim woman's right to initiate khula divorce is acknowledged, emphasizing that marriage can be dissolved without the need for judicial validation.

Headnote:(A) Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 - Dissolution of marriage through khula - A marriage may be dissolved by mutual consent as per Shariat law, with khula recognized statutorily - Respondent's rejection of petitioner's request for registration based on incorrect interpretation of khula dissolution is quashed - This highlights the absolute right of a Muslim woman to terminate marriage without judicial intervention. (Paras 3, 4)

(B) Judicial Precedent - While a Kerala High Court decision acknowledges a woman's right to initiate khula, conflicting Supreme Court judgments require husband’s consent, emphasizing the need for resolution between evolving interpretations of Islamic jurisprudence. (Paras 4)

Table of Content
1. marriage was dissolved prior. (Para 2)
2. khula recognized under shariat law. (Para 3)
3. court reinforces women's rights in divorce. (Para 4)

ORDER

Heard both sides.

2.The writ petitioner's marriage with one A.Aisha was dissolved through Court process on 21.01.2021. Thereafter, the petitioner got married to one Thamjith Nihar on 07.06.2023 as per Muslim rites and customs. The said Thamjith Nihar was also a divorcee. She had earlier married one Syed Abuthahir on 23.08.2021 and the said marriage was dissolved through Khula as evidenced vide deed dated 20.06.2022. When the petitioner herein wanted to register his marriage with Thamjith Nihar, the respondent declined to do so on the ground that no proof has been submitted to show that Thamjith Nihar had obtained dissolution of her marriage through Court. Challenging the said refusal check slip dated 08.08.2025 issued by the respondent, this writ petition has been filed.

3.Under Shariat Law, marriage can be dissolved by mutual consent between the husband and wife and this mutual consent may take the form of khula or mubara'at( 2024 SCC OnLine All 7373 ( Arshad Husain Vs. Shahneela Nishat ). A reading of Section 2 of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act , 1937 indicates that khula has been statutorily recognized and that when questions involving khula arise, the applicable law will be Shariat. Khula is a form of extra judicial divorce that can be invoked at the instance of the wife. As per Muslim personal law, marriage can be dissolved either through court or outside the court. A copy of the khula deed executed between Thamjith Nihar and Syed Abuthahir has been enclosed in the typed set of papers. It can be seen therefrom that the first marriage of Thamjith Nihar had been dissolved consensually without judicial intervention. It is very much legal. The respondent is not right in his assumption that a Muslim woman can secure dissolution of her marriage only through judicial intervention or the process of Court. I, therefore, hold that the impugned refusal check slip is liable to be quashed. It is accordingly quashed. The petitioner is permitted to represent the application for filing the memorandum of marriage. It shall be registered by the respondent.

4.The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner also relied on the decision of the Hon'ble Division Bench of the Kerala High Court reported in2022 SCC OnLine Ker 5512. It was held therein that the right of a Muslim woman to invoke khula at her own will, will have to be respected. The Hon'ble High Court affirmed its earlier ruling that the right to terminate the marriage at the instance of a Muslim wife is an absolute right and is not subject to the acceptance or the will of her husband. This judgment authored by His Lordship Mr.Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque is undoubtedly progressive and deserves celebration. The judgment declares that such a right has been conferred by the Holy Quran. It is also in tune with the current developments in Islamic jurisprudence world wide. I too feel like endorsing it in toto. But what comes in the way is the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court inZohara Khatoon v. Mohd.Ibrahim (1981) 2 SCC 509. It was held therein that khula is a form of divorce initiated by the wife and comes into existence if the husband gives consent to the agreement and releases her from the marriage tie. Where both the parties agree and desire a separation resulting in a divorce, it is called Mubara' at. The gist of these modes (Khula and Mubara' at) is that it comes into existence with the consent of both the parties, particularly, the husband, because without his consent, this mode of divorce would be incapable of being enforced. InJorden Diengdeh v. S.S.Chopra (1985) 3 SCC 62 , it was observed that Mohammaden Law provides for a decree for divorce known as Khula and Mubara' at by agreement of parties.Zohara Khatoon is by a Three Judges Bench. The standard text books (Mulla and A.A.A FYZEE)

also s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top