ORDER This writ petition has been filed for the issue of writ of Mandamus directing the 5^th respondent to issue direction to the 1^st respondent to defreeze the bank account of the petitioner.

2. This Court has carefully considered the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the materials available on record.

3. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the Arbitral Tribunal in IA No.2056 of 2025 dated 26.06.2025 wherein the 6^th respondent has straight away appointed an arbitrator and the Arbitrator has passed an order by directing the bank account maintained by the petitioner in the 1^st respondent bank to be freezed. According to the petitioner, this procedure adopted is illegal and the 6^th respondent has unilaterally appointed an arbitrator and such an order has been passed.

4. In the considered view of this Court, the grounds that have been raised by the petitioner deserves consideration. However, it cannot be dealt with in a writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India . The