Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.JOTHIRAMAN, J
Manikandan S/o.Periyasamy – Appellant
Versus
Jeevanandham S/o.Thangasamy – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks urgent case resolution due to injuries from an accident. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. high court emphasizes justification for expedited hearing. (Para 3) |
| 3. judicial systems must not show preferential treatment without grounds. (Para 4) |
| 4. court regulates case timelines in its discretion. (Para 5) |
| 5. civil revision petition is resolved with directives for case disposal. (Para 6) |
ORDER
Seeking a direction for the speedy disposal of the case in M.C.O.P.No.113 of 2023 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Chief Judicial Magistrate Court), Perambalur, the petitioner has preferred the present civil revision petition.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the accident took place in the year 2022 and claim petition was filed in the year 2023 and the same is pending for more than two years, which causes great hardship and irreparable loss to the petitioner, since he has lost his vision in right eye and sustained multiple fractures all over the body. He would further submit that the speedy disposal of M.C.O.P.No.113 of 2023 is just and necessary.
3. It is pertinent to mention that High Court cannot issue such directions for speedy dis
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
