SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 57950

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P. Dhannabal, J
S. Vidya – Appellant
Versus
Jayaprakash Thothadri – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. J. Saravanavel
For the Respondents: No appearance

Table of Content
1. petition seeking guardianship under the guardians and wards act. (Para 1 , 2)

ORDER

This petition has been filed under Sections 3 , 7 to 10 and 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 read with Order XXI Rule 2 and 3 of the Original Side Rules read with Clause 17 of the Letters Patent Act praying to (i) declare the petitioner as the Sole guardian of the person of the miner children J. Vidushi born on 24.01.2009 and J. Vidyut born on 21.08.2012, and (2) to grant permanent custody of the minor children J. Vidushi and J.

Vidyut.

2. According to the petitioner, marriage was solemnized between the petitioner and the respondent on 26.08.2007 at Srirangam, Trichy as per Hindu rites and customs and out of the wedlock, they have one daughter namely J. Vidushi and younger son namely J. Vidyut. There was matrimonial dispute between the parties. The respondent caused cruelty and neglected the petitioner and did not discharge his duties as husband and the petitioner suffered both physically and mentally and there were seveal issues between the petitioner and the respondent. Therefore, the petitioner filed a divorce petition and also filed an application seeking interim mainten

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top