Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
Dr.S.Jaikish, Dr.C.Geethasankari – Appellant
Versus
Deval Y.Patel – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek to strike off plaint in partition suit. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. respondent's claims based on ancestral rights. (Para 3 , 8) |
| 3. arguments presented by both parties regarding ownership and rights. (Para 7) |
| 4. legal reasoning confirming petitioners' ownership. (Para 10 , 12) |
| 5. court observations on ownership validity. (Para 11) |
| 6. court's observations on proceedings and rights established in previous cases. (Para 13) |
O R D E R
This petition has been filed seeking to strike off the plaint as far as “A”
schedule property in O.S.No.779 of 2021, on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Trichy.
2.Learned Counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are third parties in O.S.No.779 of 2021, on the file of the 2nd Additional Subordinate Judge, Trichy and the said suit was filed by the first respondent as against the other respondents for claiming partition, 1/5th share as against other respondents including the 'A' schedule property. Challenging, the same the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed.
3.Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the first respondent / plaintiff in the suit claims himself to be the grandson of one
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
