Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
B.Pugalendhi, J
K.Samuthiravalli – Appellant
Versus
The Additional Chief Secretary & Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Government of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of petitions for compensation due to hazardous workplace accidents. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding regulatory failure and inadequate compensation. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. expert analysis of the regulatory framework of the fireworks manufacturing industry. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. in-depth evaluation of safety measures and state accountability. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. discussion on comparative jurisprudence and constitutional obligations. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. court's directives on compensation enhancement and regulatory reforms. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
COMMON ORDER
These writ petitions have been filed by the wives of four deceased workers who lost their lives in a fire accident that took place on 02.12.2014 at a fireworks manufacturing unit located at Ettakkapatty Village, Sivakasi Taluk, Virudhunagar District. All four workers belonged to the Scheduled Caste community and were the sole breadwinners of their families. Following the incident, the petitioners approached the District Administration for compensation and employment support.
2.After assessing the socio-economic condition of the petitioners’ families, the Tahsildar submitted a report
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
