1. Writ petition under Article 32 seeking directions to implement the Employment of Manual Scavengers Act 1993 and the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and Their Rehabilitation Act 2013. (Para 3 , 4 )
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, ARAVIND KUMAR, JJ.
Dr. Balram Singh - Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (Civil) No(s). 324 of 2020
Decided On : 20-10-2023
1. Writ petition under Article 32 seeking directions to implement the Employment of Manual Scavengers Act 1993 and the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and Their Rehabilitation Act 2013. (Para 3 , 4 )
2. Whether the 2013 Act requires a national survey; validity of 2013 and 2018 surveys; non-constitution of mandated institutions; hazardous cleaning without gear as forced labor; rehabilitation for deceased workers' families. (Para 52 , 53 , 54 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 60 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 70 , 88 , 90 , 92 , 93 , 94 )
3. Directions for proper implementation of the 2013 Act including valid surveys, constitution and functioning of institutions, mechanization of sewer cleaning, and rehabilitation of hazardous workers' families. (Para 96 , 97 )
While the Act mandates localized surveys by local bodies, the Central and State Governments must lay down parameters and guidelines for their conduct. The absence of a policy framework cannot render the Act otiose. (Para 52 , 53 , 54 , 56 )
No, the surveys were invalid as they were not conducted in accordance with the prescribed methodology under the 2013 Rules, and the required institutions were not constituted or functioning at the relevant time. (Para 12 , 13 , 57 , 58 , 60 )
Yes, where minimum protective gear and cleaning devices are not provided, employment of hazardous workers amounts to forced labour prohibited under Article 23 of the Constitution. (Para 88 , 89 , 90 )
Yes, the systematic neglect and non-constitution of mandated institutions has rendered the Act a dead letter. The Central and State Governments are duty-bound to constitute and ensure effective functioning of all such institutions. (Para 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 )
Yes, the constitutional principles of dignity and fraternity, coupled with the emancipatory character of the 2013 Act, require that families of deceased hazardous workers receive entitlements akin to those of manual scavengers. (Para 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 )
JUDGMENT :
S. Ravindra Bhat, J.
1. The unforgettable annals of our history not only have charted the numerous sacrifices of the people who fought for independence from the foreign imperial ruler but also a lesser-known freedom that for millennia eluded a large mass of people, who were nearly invisible. They were trapped in the thralldom of a solitude from which there was no liberation. That was centuries old stigmatising social practices that led to their depravation, to such levels that they were not even recognised as human beings. Among these practices was one which generations of people, were made to perform the meanest task of manual scavenging. It was to address this kind of social practice and with the resolve to completely out light and emancipate those trapped in it from the thralldom of bondage, that the constitution framers ensured three important provisions, which stare at us like beacons, assuring not only equality but fraternity amongst all people: the prohibition of untouchability; the outlawing of forced or involuntary labour and the freedom against exploitation.
2. To flesh out and give shape to the objects of these provisions, Parliament intervened and enacted several legislations. The first was the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT 1955; its provisions were amended in 1976 to outlaw the practice of untouchability. The penalization of these severe forms with stringent punishment was sought to be achieved by the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 which was further strengthened by later amendments. In that ensuring full economic freedom and true emancipation were two enactments, the “Employment of Manual Scavengers and Construction of Dry Latrines (Prohibition) Act, 1993” (hereinafter “Act 1993”) and the “Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and Their Rehabilitation Act, 2013” (hereinafter “Act 2013”).
3. The present petition is filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, seeking directions to Respondents (Union of India and all the States and Union Territories) to implement provisions, inter alia, of the Act of 1993 and Act of 2013.
4. In the year 1993, a special Commission for Safai Karamchari was established as per the provisions of National Commission for Safai Karamchari Act, 1993 (hereinafter “NCSK Act”) to give its recommendations to Government regarding specific programmes for the welfare of Safai Karamcharis. In the same year, India took another significant step by prohibiting the employment of manual scavengers responsible for the daily manual emptying of certain types of dry toilets. Subsequently, the Parliament enacted the Act of 2013 which extended and clarified its scope to include insanitary latrines, ditches and pits. However, the petitioner claims that the respondents have not implemented essential provisions of these statutes. Regrettably, manual scavenging persists despite these legislations. Petitioner prayed that Act of 1993 and 2013 should be implemented in letter and spirit and to do so, it is necessary to impose a blanket ban on manual scavenging, while simultaneously ensuring adequate rehabilitation and employment opportunities for those currently engaged in these practices.
5. This Court previously addressed this subject matter in Safai Karamchari Andolan and Others vs. Union of India & Ors., (2014) 11 SCC 224 and after analyzing the provisions of 2013 Act, issued following directions :
“23. We have already noted various provisions of the 2013 Act and also in the light of various orders of this Court, we issue the following directions:
23.1. The persons included in the final list of manual scavengers under Sections 11 and 12 of the 2013 Act, shall be rehabilitated as per the provisions of Chapter IV of the 2013 Act, in the following manner, namely:
(a) such initial, one-time cash assistance, as may be prescribed;
(b) their children shall be entitled
AI
Legislation prohibits manual scavenging and mandates rehabilitation, yet ineffective implementation led to continued practices; court directed comprehensive measures to ensure adherence and accountab....
The judgment emphasizes the importance of implementing rehabilitation measures for manual scavengers as per the provisions outlined in the relevant Acts.
The court mandated compliance with compensation directives and safety regulations for laborers engaged in hazardous work, emphasizing the state’s duty to protect fundamental rights.
The court mandated strict compliance by the Government with statutory provisions regarding the welfare of sanitation workers, affirming the importance of safeguarding their rights and health, especia....
The court held that principal employers can be held liable under the Atrocities Act for failing to prevent manual scavenging, emphasizing the importance of supervision and safety measures.
GNCTD does not have any other choice except to implement statutory provisions as contained under provisions of Prohibition of Employment As Manual Scavengers And Their Rehabilitation Act, 2013.
The statute mandates timely filing of complaints; failure to comply renders criminal proceedings invalid.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.