Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dr. Justice A.D. Maria Clete, J
R.Kariamal – Appellant
Versus
The Management of Raj T.V.Network Ltd – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. employment termination history and context (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. claim statement and labour court's decision (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. arguments regarding limitation and abandonment (Para 10 , 12 , 15 , 18) |
| 4. court's observations about due process and natural justice (Para 11 , 13 , 14 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. procedural requirements for industrial disputes (Para 21 , 22 , 38 , 39) |
| 6. criteria for valid termination and abandonment (Para 41 , 46) |
| 7. relief granted to the workman (Para 52 , 53) |
JUDGMENT
Heard.
2. The petitioner, a workman, has filed this writ petition challenging the award passed by the First Additional Labour Court, Chennai, in ID No. 92/2018 dated 04.12.2019, as well as the order in I.A. No. 3/2019 issued on the same date. The award was decided against the workman, and his application in I.A. No. 3/2019, seeking to summon documents from the respondent management, was also dismissed. Upon filing of the writ petition, notice was issued to the respondent on 07.02.2020. In response, the respondent management has entered an appearance through counsel.
3. The workman’s case is that he was employed as a driver, having joined service on 27.09.1999. His services was terminat
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
