Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mr. Shamim Ahmed, J
Kulanthaisamy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the legal framework for the appeal is established. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. claims of arbitrary action against the police and the significance of ownership were discussed. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. criteria for judicial discretion regarding vehicle seizures were analyzed. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. rationale for reversing the lower court's order was presented. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 5. final ruling and directives following the court's reasoning were issued. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
ORDER
1. This Criminal Revision Case is filed to call for the records relating to the order, dated 19.07.2025 passed in Crl.MP.No.322 of 2025, by the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Papanasam, Thanjavur and to set aside the same and to order return of the Ashok Leyland Lorry Vehicle, bearing Registration No.TN-31-V-2223 seized by the Respondent Police and kept in the custody of the above said Court in Cr.No.1154 of 2025 to the Revision Petitioner.
2. The case of the Prosecution is that when on 23.11.2024 at 04.45 Hours, the Respondent Police along with his Team were on patrol duty at Puthur Kollidam River Side, they found that the Revision Petitioner illegally quarried three units of river
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
