Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V. Lakshminarayanan, J
T.N.Raja Gounder – Appellant
Versus
R.K.Muthusami – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. relief sought in o.s. proceedings. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. origin of the property and family details. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. defendants argue sham sale deed. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 4. details of defendants' possession claims. (Para 18 , 20) |
| 5. overview of arguments regarding possession. (Para 29 , 30) |
| 6. definition and nature of sham transactions. (Para 35 , 36 , 38 , 39) |
| 7. no need to formally cancel sham transaction. (Para 70 , 72) |
| 8. conclusion reaffirming original judgment. (Para 92 , 93) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
These three second appeals, having arisen out of a common judgment, have been heard together and disposed of by this common judgment.
2. O.S.No.236 of 1985 came to be filed seeking for the following reliefs:
“To declare the plaintiffs and the fourth defendant are entitled to the suit property and the title to the same with them.
To grant permanent injunction restraining them in any way interfering with the plaintiffs possession and direct the defendants 1 to 3 to pay the Court and grant such other relief or reliefs.”
3. O.S.No.304 of 1985 came to be filed seeking for the following reliefs:
“To restrain the defendants and their men in any way interfering with the peaceful poss
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
