Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SHAMIM AHMED, J
Sureshkumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and facts. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. court's analysis on delay and sufficient cause principles. (Para 4 , 6 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 3. arguments regarding maintainability of delay petition. (Para 5 , 9) |
| 4. dismissal of criminal miscellaneous petition. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
ORDER
The present Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act , to condone the delay of 102 days in filing the Criminal Revision Case against the order of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam, passed in Cr.M.P.No.5037 of 2024 in CC.No.54 of 2024, dated 13.12.2024.
2.Heard Mr.A.S.Abul Kalam Azad, learned Government Advocate for the respondent.
3.The facts of case, in a nutshell, led to filing of this Petition and necessary for disposal of same, are as follows:-
a) One Palpandi, who was the President of Chinnamanur Devendra Kula Vellalar Uravinmurai, is the uncle of the defacto complainant. On 03.08.2023, at around 11.00 pm., the petitioners along with other accused persons gathered in front of the said Palpandi's father's house with deadly weapons and by using filthy language threw stones on the said h
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
