IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.Jayachandran, MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, JJ
The Managing Director, State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Limited – Appellant
Versus
M/s.Siemens Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. acknowledgment of procedural context and key facts. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. presentation of claims and counterclaims between parties. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was made by MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.)
The present appeal has been filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act , 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act, 1996’), aggrieved by an order dated 02.08.2021 passed in O.P.No.41 of 2018, filed under Section 34 of the Act, 1996, by a learned Single Judge of this court.
2. For better appreciation, the few facts, which are relevant and undisputed are noted hereunder.
2.1. The State Industrial Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Limited (hereinafter referred to as the 'SIPCOT') developed an Information Technology Park at Siruseri for the promotion and development of industries. One company by name M/s.DATS (India) Limited (hereinafter referred to as the ‘DATS’) has applied for the allotment of a plot for their industrial unit in the said IT park. By an Allotment order dated 05.03.2004, Plot Nos.A-23, A- 24, A-25, A-34 and A-35, totally admeasuring 4.57 acres, was allotted in favour of the DATS, subject to various terms and conditions, and the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.