SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 5

MADRAS HIGH COURT
A, J
In Re: Balagopal


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:[Name of Advocate]
For the Respondents: [Public Prosecutor]

Table of Content
1. conviction for murder under ipc. (Para 1 , 2)
2. defense of insanity raised. (Para 11 , 12)
3. determination of mental capacity at time of act. (Para 15 , 16)
4. conviction set aside due to insanity. (Para 18)

1. The appellant Balagopal stands convicted by the learned First Additional Sessions Judge of Madras Division of offences punishable under two counts of S.302, I.P.C. for having on 14-1-1971 at about 12.15 P.M. at his house in the I.C.F. Colony committed the murders of this wife Padmavathy and his son Prasob by cutting them with a knife and has been sentenced to imprisonment for life under each count.

2. The appellant joined the Integral Coach Factory as a Peon and after some years of service he was promoted as materials clerk. He married Padmavathy, the only daughter of P.W. 16. The appellant and his wife were living at door No. 166/5, I.C.F. Colony. Padmavathy went to the house of her mother P.W. 16 for her second confinement, leaving her husband Balagopal at Madras. Subsequently after the birth of the second child, the appellant went to Tellichery to the house of his mother - in - law P.W. 16, stayed there for a week and returned with his wife and the child t


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top