A subsequent purchaser can challenge land acquisition proceedings if they demonstrate a legal grievance, particularly where compensation has not been paid and possession has not been taken under the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013.

1. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned letter No. 33023 / LA(1) / 2005-22 dated 9.3.2009 issued by the Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department, Chennai, the first respondent herein, wherein the request of the petitioner for re - conveyance of the land in question was rejected, to quash the same with a further direction to the respondents to re - convey the property measuring 4.33 acres comprised in Survey Nos. 612/5, 612/7, 612/8, 612/9, 612/10 at Sholinganallur Village from acquisition proceedings with one another direction to transfer the property to the petitioner herein. During the pendency of the writ petition, on the arrival of the new Act, namely, The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 , which came into force on 1.1.2014, MP No. 1 of 2014 was filed seeking to amend the prayer, as follows: -
"To issue a Writ of Declaration, declaring that the land acquisition proceedings in respect of the land comprised in S. Nos. 612/5, 612/7, 612/8, 612/9, 612/10 and 612/12A of Shozhinganallur Village, Shozhinganallur Taluk, Kancheepuram District as having lapsed as per S.24(2) of the ."
Similarly, M.P. No. 2 of 2012 was filed seeking to raise additional grounds, as follows: -
"(i) No compensation has so far been paid for the lands acquired by an award that was passed in the year 1997 even after the lapse of almost of 17 years. Therefore, on coming into force of the Act 30 of 2013, the land acquisition proceedings in respect of the petitioner's land shall be deemed to have lapsed as provided under S.24(2) of the .
(ii) The physical possession of the petitioner's property has not been taken by the respondents though the award was passed in the year 1997 as this Hon'ble Court has held that the petitioner is in possession of the property. Therefore, on coming into force of the Act 30 of 2013, the land acquisition proceedings in respect of the petitioner's land shall be deemed to have lapsed as provided under S.24(2) of the .
(iii) The entire land acquisition proceedings by which the land acquisition proceedings were initiated as against the petitioner's land has been quashed by an order passed in WP No. 6432 of 1998 and affirmed by the Division Bench as well by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Therefore, the title of property is vested with the petitioner company consequent upon the quashing of entire notification."

2. Mr. R. Muthukumarasamy, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner placed four arguments in support of the prayer. The petitioner, originally known as Mascot Systems Limited, had subsequently changed the name of the company as iGATE Global Solutions Limited with effect from 23.6.2003 and has been engaged in the business of information technology and information technology enables services. With an intention to set up a software unit in the State of Tamil Nadu, the petitioner purchased land admeasuring 4.98 acres comprised in S. Nos. 612/5, 612/7, 612/8, 612/9, 612/10 & 612/12 at Sholinganallur village, Tambaram Taluk, Kancheepuram District from Mr. Sujith Cherian and others under sale