Back
MADRAS HIGH COURT
N. Kirubakaran, J
Davidson A. v. State
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts surrounding the murder committed by the accused. (Para 4) |
| 2. defense arguments presented by the appellant's counsel. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. court's observations on evidence and prosecution case. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 4. ruling on the applicability of insanity defense. (Para 20 , 23) |
| 5. final conclusion on the appellant's appeal. (Para 24 , 26) |
1. This appeal is filed as against the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellant / sole accused by the Sessions Court, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil, in S.C.No.151 of 2017, dated 26.04.2017.
2. The appellant faced the trial for the offences punishable under S.294(b), S.449, S.302, S.324 and S.506(ii), IPC.
3. In conclusion of the trial, the learned Trial Judge found the appellant guilty for the below mentioned offences, convicted and sentenced him as follows:
4. The facts of the case, as projected by the prosecution, in a nutshell, are as follows:
4.1. The accused was working as a Coolie and he was engaged by one Thangappan for certain works. The deceased Thangappan was also working as a Coolie. Though the deceased engaged the accused, he was not regularly providing the work to the appellant. On 25.06.2013, at about 5.30 a.m
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
