Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B. BALAJI, J
The Management of Melanmai Eyakkunar, Tamil Nadu Kudineer Vadikal Variyam, Chepauk, Chennai – Appellant
Versus
K.Nagaraj – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of execution petition and previous dismissal. (Para 2 , 4 , 12 , 20) |
| 2. arguments regarding eligibility and entitlement. (Para 5 , 9 , 10 , 19) |
| 3. court's examination of the arguments and precedents. (Para 11 , 13 , 24) |
| 4. court's reasoning on reinstatement and entitlements. (Para 14 , 16 , 18 , 21) |
| 5. final decision directing computation of amounts due. (Para 28 , 29) |
COMMON ORDER
The Management of Melanmai Eyakkunar, Tamil Nadu Kudineer Vadikal Variyam, Chennai, is the revision petitioner in both these revision petitions.
2.The revision petitioner challenges the order of arrest passed by the executing Court, issuing a direction to arrest the Managing Director of the revision petitioner and detain him in civil prison for disobedience of the award in I.D.No.48 of 2001.
3.I have heard Mr.S.Silambanan, learned Senior Counsel for Mrs.S.Mekhala, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.V.Ajoy Khose, learned counsel for the respondent in both the revision petitions.
4.Mr.S.Silambanan, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the revision petitioner/Management would first and foremost submit that the very execution petition itself filed after lapse of 23 years, from the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
