IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SENTHILKUMAR
Visu Financiers, Represented By Its Managing Partner – Appellant
Versus
G. Sundararaj – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arguments regarding limitation application. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 8 , 10 , 10) |
| 2. principles related to the limitation act. (Para 9 , 11 , 12 , 16) |
| 3. factual background of the case. (Para 13) |
| 4. court observations on justice and limitation. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. conclusion and order from the court. (Para 23) |
ORDER :
The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Kumbakonam, in I.A.No. 236 of 2019 in O.S.No.144 of 2004, dated 15.10.2022.
3.The brief facts of the case are as follows:
3(2).Thereafter, the respondent/defendant had filed an application in I.A.No.215 of 2012 before the trial Court seeking permission to deposit 1/3 amount, which was also dismissed by the trial Court by order, dated 05.12.2012, against which, the respondent/defendant had preferred a revision petition before this Court in C.R.P(MD)No.555 of 2013. This Court had dismissed the said revision petition vide order, dated 02.07.2018. Thereafter, the revision petitioner/plaintiff had filed a final decree application in I.A.No. 236 of 2019 in O.S.No.144 of 2004. The learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Kumbakonam, vide
Meghraj vs Jesraj Kasturjee and another
Monotosh Kumar Mitra vs Amarendranath Shaw (dead) and others
The applicability of Article 136 of the Limitation Act supersedes Article 137 for final decree applications, allowing exclusion of prior litigation periods in calculating limitation.
Point of law: Once court accepts explanation as sufficient it is the result of positive exercise of discretion and normally the superior court should not disturb such finding, much less in revisiiona....
The enforceability of a decree begins from the judgment of the appellate court, not from the original decree, thus validating timely execution petitions.
The execution of an ex parte decree is not barred by limitation if the decree has merged with a revisional order, resetting the limitation period for enforcement.
The period for executing a decree runs from the date of the appellate decree, even when there is an appeal regarding part of the decree.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.