SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 9947

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C. Saravanan, J
Dharmesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer – Respondent
W.P.No .9623 of 202 3 | W.M.P.Nos.9675 & 9677 of 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Hema Muralikrishnan
For the Respondents: B.Ramasamy

Reassessment notices issued under the old regime between April 1, 2021, and June 30, 2021, are treated as show-cause notices under section 148A(b) of the new regime. Limitation periods for subsequent reassessment notices must be calculated by excluding the duration of the court-mandated stay period and applying TOLA extensions.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), 149 and 151 - Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 - Reassessment proceedings - Limitation - Reassessment notices issued under the old regime between 01.04.2021 and 30.06.2021 must be treated as show-cause notices under S. 148A(b) of the new regime - Computation of limitation period must exclude the time during which original notices were stayed in terms of judicial directives - Where an assessee fails to reply to a S. 148A(b) notice, the Assessing Officer is required to pass an order under S. 148A(d) within one month from the end of the month in which time to furnish such reply expired - Assessment of limitation is subject to valid extensions under the TOLA Act 2020.

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged reassessment notices and orders issued for the Assessment Year 2017-2018, contending that the proceedings were barred by limitation. Initially, a notice under the old regime was issued on 05.04.2021. Following the amendment of the Income Tax Act in 2021 and Supreme Court directions, these proceedings were treated as being under the new regime (S. 148A).

Findings of Court:
The court held that the impugned notices were within the prescribed time limits after accounting for TOLA extensions and the exclusion of the stay period as per Supreme Court precedents. The court remitted the matter back to the respondents to allow the petitioner to file a reply, provided it is submitted within the specified timeframe.

Issues: Whether the reassessment proceedings initiated under the old regime and converted to the new regime for the Assessment Year 2017-2018 were time-barred under the amended provisions of the Income Tax Act.

Ratio Decidendi: Following the ratio in 'Ashish Agarwal' and 'Rajeev Bansal', the court determined that reassessment notices issued via the 2021 amendment were deemed stayed for the period allowed for information supply and response. Therefore, by applying the statutory extensions under TOLA, the challenged proceedings were found to be within the legal limitation period.

Result: Disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a reply.

Table of Content
1. challenge to reassessment notices issued under the pre-amendment regime. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. binding precedent from supreme court regarding conversion of old notices to new regime. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. calculation of limitation period for reassessment notice issuance including stay exclusions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
4. statutory timeline requirements for assessing officers under s. 148a(d). (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
5. remittance for fresh assessment opportunity subject to compliance. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)

O R D E R

1.In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the Notice dated 29.07.2022 issued by the under Section 148 of the Act under the new regime and the Order dated 29.07.2022 passed by the respondents under Section 148A(d) of the Act under the regime for the Assessment Year 2017-2018.

2. The Petitioner had not filed a Return of Income for the Assessment Year 2017-2018. Earlier, Notice under Section 148 of the Act under the old regime as in force from 31.03.2021 was issued by the Respondent on 05.04.2021 to the Petitioner for the Assessment Year 2017-2018, which has culminated in the impugned proceedings pursuant to the amendment to the Income Tax Act, 1961 with effect from 01.04.2021.

3. Heard M/s Hema Muralikrishnan, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr.Ramasamy, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Respondents.

4. Have perused the documents and the list of dates and events qua Paragraph No.28 from the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Union of India Vs. Ashish Agarwal , (2023) 1 SCC 617 and Paragraph Nos.112 and 114 from the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Union of India Vs. Rajeev Bansal , 2024 SCC Online SC 2993.

5. It will therefore be useful to refer to passage from Paragraph No.28 from Ashish Agarwal case (cited supra) and Paragraph Nos.112 and 114 from Rajeev Bansal case (cited supra).

6. For the sake of clarity, Paragraph No.28 from Ashish Agarwal case (cited supra) is reproduced below:-

“28. In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, the present Appeals are allowed in part. The impugned common judgments and orders passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in W.T. No. 524/2021 and other allied tax appeals/petitions, is/are hereby modified and substituted as under:

(i) The impugned section 148 notices issued to the respective assessees which were issued under unamended section 148 of the IT Act, which were the subject matter of writ petitions before the various respective High Courts shall be deemed to have been issued under section 148A of the IT Act as substituted by the Finance Act, 2021 and construed or treated to be show cause notices in terms of section 148A(b). The assessing officer shall, within thirty days from today provide to the respective assessees information and material relied upon by the Revenue, so that the assessees can reply to the show cause notices within two weeks thereafter

(ii) The requirement of conducting any enquiry, if required, with the prior approval of specified authority under section 148A(a) is hereby dispensed with as a onetime measure visàvis those notices which have been issued under section 148 of the unamended Act from 01.04.2021 till date, including those which have been quashed by the High Courts. Even otherwise as observed hereinabove holding any enquiry with the prior approval of specified authority is not mandatory but it is for the concerned Assessing Officers to hold any enquiry, if required;

(iii) The assessing officers shall thereafter pass orders in terms of section 148A(d) in respect of each of the concerned assessees; Thereafter after following the procedure as required under section 148A may issue notice under section 148 (as substituted)

(iv) All defences which may be available to the assesses including those available under section 149 of the IT Act and all rights and contentions which may be available to the concerned asses

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top