SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 398

M. R. SHAH, B. V. NAGARATHNA
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Ashish Agarwal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) :N. Venkataraman, ASG Santosh Kumar, Praneet Pranav, Raj Bahadur Yadav, Advocates
For the Respondent(s):C.A. Sundaram, Kavita Jha, Vaibhav Kulkarni, Anant Mann, Udit Naresh, Nishit Agrawal, Harsh Mishra, Upasna Agrawal, Mohit Kumar Bansal, Shubhakriti Gaur, Rakesh Gupta, Somil Agarwal, Ambhoj Kumar Sinha, Kapil Goel, Sandeep Goel, Dhananjay Garg, D. K. Garg, Abhishek Garg, Divyanshu Agrawal, Vaibhav Niti, Madhavi Agrawal, Abhinav Agrawal, Gaurav Jain, Akshita Goyal, Shubham Gupta, Archana Sahadeva, Abhinav Agrawal, Subodh S. Patil, Abhinav Merhotra, Kush Chaturvedi, Priyashree Sharma PH, Syed Faraz Alam, Advocates

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - The Court holds that reassessment notices issued under unamended Section 148 after 01.04.2021 should be deemed as issued under Section 148A as substituted by Finance Act, 2021, and treated as show-cause notices to proceed under substituted provisions (paras (!) - (!) ). - It directs that assessing officers provide information/material relied upon within 30 days and allow replies within two weeks, with further steps under Section 148A(d) and (b) following the substituted regime (paras (!) - (!) , (!) - (!) ). - It grants dispensation from prior approval for conducting enquiries as a one-time measure for notices issued under unamended Section 148 after 01.04.2021, and emphasizes that safeguards remain, with rights and defences preserved under Finance Act, 2021 (paras (!) - (!) , (!) - (!) ). - The decision uses Article 142 of the Constitution to settle PAN-India: it modifies and substitutes the Allahabad High Court judgment and applies across other High Courts to avoid ~9,000+ pending appeals, ensuring uniform application of substituted provisions (paras (!) - (!) , (!) - (!) ).

How to apply the substituted provisions of Sections 147 to 151 of the IT Act (Finance Act, 2021) to reassessment notices issued under unamended Section 148 after 01.04.2021?

What is the guidance on treating reassessment notices issued under unamended Section 148 as notices under Section 148A and proceeding with reassessment under the substituted provisions?

What is the scope of Article 142 of the Constitution of India in modifying and pan-India applying the High Court judgments on reassessment notices post-01.04.2021?


JUDGMENT

M.R. Shah, J.

Leave granted in SLP (C) Nos. 6448/2022, 5381/2022, 5079/2022, 6092/2022, 6534/2022, 6158/2022, 6316/2022, 6281/2022, 6545/2022, 6038/2022.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Writ Tax No. 524/2021 and other allied writ tax petitions, by which the High Court has allowed the said writ petitions and has quashed several reassessment notices issued by the Revenue, issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on the ground that the same are bad in law in view of the amendment by the Finance Act, 2021 which has amended Income Tax Act by introducing new provisions i.e. sections 147 to 151 w.e.f. 1st April, 2021, the Revenue has preferred the present appeals.

2. Similar judgments and orders are passed by various other High Courts including High Court of Delhi; High Court of Rajasthan; High Court of Calcutta; High Court of Madras; High Court of Bombay, the particulars


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top