Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J
Jasmine – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial court observations on the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments for the petitioner's innocence. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's reasoning on vehicle release. (Para 6 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. legal context around custody rights. (Para 7) |
ORDER
Heard M/s.S.Modharshini, learned Counsel for Revision Petitioner and Mr.P.Kottaisamy, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), for Respondent.
2. This Criminal Revision Case has been filed challenging the order dated 18.03.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.539 of 2025 passed by Principal Special Court for NDPS Act cases, Madurai, whereby petitioner's request for interim custody of the vehicle viz., Yamaha Fascino bearing Registration No.TN-57-CV-7947 in Crime No.17 of 2025 on the file of Kodaikanal Police Station, Dindigul, was rejected.
3. M/s.S.Modharshini, learned Counsel for Revision Petitioner would submit that petitioner is working as a primary coordinator at MAM Alqalam, Kodaikanal and in the year 2024, she purchased a two wheeler bearing registration No.TN-57-CV-7947, Yamaha Fascino for her everyday transport. On the date of alleged offence, petitioner's husband's friend had borrowed her vehicle and had used it for the alleged offence of transporting 1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
