SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 35

SANJAY KAROL, MANMOHAN
Bishwajit Dey – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Adeel Ahmed, AOR Mr. Raja Chatterjee, Adv. Mr. Sabrish Ahmed, Adv. Mr. Ayushi Arora, Adv. Ms. Anupama Gupta, Adv. Ms. Riya Dutta, Adv. Mr. Piyush Sachdev, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Ms. Diksha Rai, AOR Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Adv. Ms. Apurva Sachdev, Adv. Mr. Piyush Vyas, Adv. Ms. Purvat Wali, Adv.

Judgement Key Points

The legal document discusses the principles governing the release and confiscation of seized vehicles in criminal cases, particularly under laws related to drug trafficking. It emphasizes that vehicles can generally be released on interim basis during trial if certain conditions are met, such as ensuring proper identification, safeguarding evidence, and preventing misuse. The court recognizes that seized vehicles are important for evidence but also notes that indefinite detention in police custody can lead to deterioration and economic loss. The court highlights that there is no specific legal restriction preventing the interim release of vehicles used in drug offenses, provided that the owner can prove they were not involved or connived in the offense. Conditions such as videography, signing inventories, and restrictions on sale can be imposed to safeguard evidence and prevent misuse. Ultimately, the court favors releasing vehicles in appropriate cases to benefit owners, society, and to prevent unnecessary damage or depreciation, while ensuring safeguards are in place to preserve the integrity of the case.


JUDGMENT :

MANMOHAN, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. The Criminal Appeal has been filed challenging the impugned judgment and order dated 23rd January, 2024 passed by the Gauhati High Court at Assam in Case number Crl. Rev. No.P/483/2023, whereby the appellant’s writ petition challenging the order dated 09th October, 2023 passed by the Additional Sessons Judge Karbi Anglong, Diphu, in Dillai Police Station case No.32/2023, corresponding to G.R. Case No.150/2023 dated 05th October, 2023 was dismissed.

RELEVANT FACTS

3. Briefly stated the relevant facts of the present case are that the appellant had purchased a Truck for commercial purpose bearing Registration No.AS-01-NC-4355 (hereinafter referred to as “the Vehicle”) with the intent of plying the same. The Vehicle was purchased on monthly Equated Monthly Instalment of Rs.1,00,020/- (One lakh and twenty rupees) and according to the appellant, it is his only source of income.

4. On 10th April, 2023, the Vehicle was coming from Dimapur side and was signaled to stop at naka checking point. The Police officer searched the Vehicle and found two identical soap boxes containing suspected heroin which was covered in black polythene, kept concealed insi

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top