Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MR SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J
S.Nagarajan – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of quarry lease and allegations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding procedural and substantive issues under pmla. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. contentions concerning the evidence and reports on illegal activities. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. legal discussion on money laundering definitions and implications. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. implications of statements made during the investigation. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 6. court's assessment of evidence and charges under pmla. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 7. preliminary conclusions on the sufficient grounds for case proceeding. (Para 26 , 27) |
| 8. final decision on dismissing the revision petition. (Para 28) |
| 9. judgment dismissing the petition without merit findings. (Para 29) |
ORDER
Factual Background
An entity named ‘Olympus Granites (P) Limited’ (Olympus Granites’) applied for grant of lease to quarry multi-coloured granite over an extent of 1.21.5 hectares in SF No.259 / 4B2 of Keelavalavu Village, Melur, Madurai District, for a period of 30 years under Rule 19A of the Tamil Nadu Minor Minerals Concessions Rules, 1959. By G.O.(3D) No.46, Industries (MMB-1) Department dated 14.07.2008, the Government of Tamil
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
