IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J
N.Gopalsamy – Appellant
Versus
S.P.K.Kathiresan – Respondent
Criminal Original Petition|C.C.No.15 of 2020
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. expedite criminal trial for lengthy delays. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's duty to consider arguments and facts. (Para 3) |
| 3. guidelines on setting deadlines for case proceedings. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. court's determination in exceptional circumstances. (Para 6) |
| 5. final order on case disposal. (Para 7) |
ORDER
This criminal original petition has been filed by the petitioner/complainant seeking expeditious disposal of C.C.No.15 of 2020 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Pollachi, Coimbatore District, arising out of the private complaint filed under Section 200 of Cr.P.C. for the offences under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, within a stipulated time.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner, who is a senior citizen, filed a private complaint against the respondent and the same was taken on file as C.C.No.15 of 2020 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Pollachi, Coimbatore District. He further submitted that the proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, has to be completed within a period of six months from the date of filing the complaint, as per Section 143(3) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, despite which, it has been pending for trial for the past five years. Therefore, this petition has been filed seeking early disposal of the proceedings in C.C.No.15 of 2020 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Pollachi, Coimbatore District.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.
4. It is pertinent to state that a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court, in the case of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh reported in (2024) 6 SCC 267, has held that the constitutional courts, in the ordinary course, should refrain from fixing a time-bound schedule for the disposal of cases pending before any other court. The relevant portion of the said decision for the sake of ready reference is reproduced below: "47.3. Constitutional courts, in the ordinary course, should refrain from fixing a time-bound schedule for the disposal of cases pending before any other courts. Constitutional courts may issue directions for the time-bound disposal of cases only in exceptional circumstances. The issue of prioritising the disposal of cases should be best left to the decision of the courts concerned where the cases are pending."
(emphasis supplied by this Court).
5. It has also been held in the aforesaid extracted portion that in exceptional circumstances, constitutional courts may issue directions for time bound disposal of cases.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and also considering that the petitioner/complainant is a senior citizen and the case is of the year 2020 and the same has been pending for the past five years, which, in the opinion of this Court are exceptional circumstances, this Court directs the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Pollachi, Coimbatore District, to dispose of the case in C.C.No.15 of 2020, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of one year from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by following the mandate under Section 143(3) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
7. With the above direction, this criminal original petition stands disposed of.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.