Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.SOUNTHAR, J
Shakila Shareef – Appellant
Versus
K.Shabeena Shareef – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of partition suit and application. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. maintainability of application for advocate commissioner. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's duty in final decree proceedings. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. process of appointing an advocate commissioner. (Para 11) |
| 5. dismissal of civil revision petition. (Para 13) |
For Petitioners : M/s.R.Thenamirtha Shyamala O R D E R The Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the trial Judge appointing Advocate Commissioner to suggest modes of Division as per the preliminary decree for partition.
2. The respondents/plaintiffs filed a suit for partition and a preliminary decree for partition was passed declaring 1/16th share to first plaintiff and 7/8th share to each of the plaintiffs 2 and 3.
3. Pursuant to the preliminary decree passed by the trial Court, the plaintiffs filed instant application seeking appointment of Advocate Commissioner to divide the property as per the preliminary decree. The trial Court by the impugned order appointed an Advocate Commissioner to suggest the mode of division as per the preliminary decree. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioners/defendants have come before this Court. 4. The
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
