Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
N.Veerasamy – Appellant
Versus
District Collector cum Inspector of Panchayats, O/o. District Collectorate, Chengalpattu District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural issues surrounding removal from office (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. petitioner's defense against the allegations (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 3. arguments for the applicability of remedies (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 4. judicial review principles and natural justice (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 5. guidelines for exercising powers under the panchayats act (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 6. requirements for issuing show cause notice (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 7. need for reasoned decisions in quasi-judicial contexts (Para 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61) |
| 8. court's final decision to set aside the order (Para 62) |
ORDER :
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
The petitioner was elected as the President of the Mambakkam Panchayat situated at Chengalpet District. The District Collector initiated proceedings under Section 205 (1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994. A notice was issued on 04.05.2023. Five charges were levelled against the petitioner. The petitioner submitted his reply to the same. He denied the allegations made against him as false. The Collector accepted the explanation of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
