MANGESH S.PATIL
Premlata Parmeshwar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Mangesh S. Patil, J. - Heard. Rule. The Rule is made returnable forthwith. The learned advocates for the respondents waive service. With the consent of both the sides the matter is heard finally at the stage of admission.
2. The petitioner was a directly elected President of Municipal Council, Omerga. He is challenging decision of the State Government taken under Section 55(1) and 55A, 55B of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 (hereinafter the Act) and disqualifying her from becoming a Councillor for a period of 6 years.
3. On a complaint dated 27.10.2020 of some of the Councillors made to the respondent Collector, regarding various misdeeds of the petitioner, the Collector Osmanabad appointed a committee headed by Chief Officer of the Municipal Council Kallamb to enquire into the allegations, by his order dated 31.12.2020. The committee conducted an enquiry and submitted its report on 27.03.2021. In turn the Collector Osmanabad by his letter dated 3.6.2021 forwarded the report to the State Government soliciting appropriate action. The State Government served a notice to the petitioner in response to which she submitted her
Biecco Lawrie Ltd. And Anr. vs. State of W.B. and Anr; AIR 2010 SC 142
Kishore Samrite vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others; (2013) 2 SCC 398
Municipal Corporation of the City of Ahmedabad vs. Ben Hiraben Manilal; AIR 1983 SC 537
Rameshchandra S/o Shankarlal Saboo (Dr.) vs. State of Maharashtra and ors; 2002(4) MhLJ 892
Ravi Yashwant Bhoir vs. The Collector
Santlal Gupta and Ors. vs. Modern Co-operative Group Housing Society Ltd. And Ors
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.