Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.V. Karthikeyan, K.Kumaresh Babu, JJ
M/s.Siva Industries and Holdings Limited – Appellant
Versus
The Directorate of Enforcement – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. analysis of claims made under pmla act (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. arguments supporting the legitimate claim of the second respondent (Para 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's consideration of the restoration order under pmla (Para 13 , 14) |
| 4. interpretation of pmla provisions regarding restoration of properties (Para 15 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. final judgment allowing revision (Para 22) |
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by K.Kumaresh Babu J.)
The present Criminal Revision petition has been filed challenging the order dated 09.12.2025 made in Crl.MP.No.1053 of 2025 in Spl.C.C.No.02 of 2021
2. Heard Mr.Vijay Narayan, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr.S.Ravi learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Cibi Vishnu, learned Special Public Prosecutor (ED) appearing for the first respondent and Mr.M.L.Ganesh, learned counsel appearing for the second respondent.
3. Mr.Vijaya Naryan learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Revision Petitioner would submit that the petitioner had been embroiled in various litigations including the proceedings under PMLA Act. He would submit that the appellant had independently borrowed monies from the second respondent and had also stood as a g
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
