Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Deepak Roshan, J
JogendraSingh, son of Pritpal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Punjab National Bank (E-United Bank of India) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.
Petitioners have approached this Court for following reliefs:-
(i) For issuance of appropriate writ(s)/order(s)/direction(s) for quashing up of the letter No. 688, dated 21.07.2022 (Annexure-5) by which the Deputy Commissioner, SaraikellaKharsawan has illegally handed over the property of the petitioners to Respondent No.5 which was located at Plot No. M-18, 6th Phase, Adityapur Industrial Area, Jamshedpur, District-SaraikellaKharsawan being survey plot No. 2147 (P), Khata No. 744 measuring an area of land about 45000 square feet at Village Bara Gamharia, Thana No. 66, Thana Saraikella, P.S. Adityapur, District Saraikella Kharsawan (hereinafter to be referred to as ‘the property);
(ii) For issuance of appropriate writ(s)/order(s)/direction(s) upon Respondent No.5 for restraining him from further construction on the property located at Plot No. M-18, 6th Phase, Adityapur Industrial Area, Jamshedpur, District-SaraikellaKharsawan being survey plot No. 2147(P), Khata No. 744 measuring an area of land about 45000 square feet at Village Bara Gamharia, Thana No. 66, Thana Saraikella, P.S. Aditdyapur, District SaraikellaKharsawan.
(iii) For issuance of appropriate w
A bona fide purchaser at auction is protected, and a writ petition challenging the confirmation of sale is not maintainable if filed beyond the statutory period.
The court affirmed the validity of a mortgage auction, emphasizing banks' rights over secured properties despite challenges from subsequent purchasers and procedural compliance in auction processes.
The judgment emphasizes the finality of sale transactions, the need to balance the interests of defaulters and creditors, and the importance of following the statutory provisions for challenging the ....
Auction sale under SARFAESI Act upheld; simultaneous civil proceedings do not invalidate the completed transaction, and allegations of undervaluation found unsubstantiated.
The court upheld the dismissal of a writ petition due to the availability of an alternative remedy under the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, emphasizing the need for statutory compliance in auc....
The court upheld the Recovery Officer's discretion in auction conduct, ruling that established legality and auction terms prevent invalidation due to later higher bids.
The Recovery Officer should cancel the auction sale if the bank's dues are paid before the sale is confirmed. The auction purchaser has no right over the property before the sale is confirmed.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of upholding consent terms, the obligations of the parties, and preventing deliberate obstruction of recovery proceedings.
Recovery Officers must adhere to jurisdictional limits and cannot impose binding interim orders affecting property rights without proper evidentiary basis and due process.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
