Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J
Krishnaveni W/o. Kumaresan – Appellant
Versus
V Jayaraman S/o. Late Varadaraja Chettiar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. validity of the relinquishment deed requires evidence. (Para 1 , 3 , 10) |
| 2. appellant claims misrepresentation in consent. (Para 2 , 12) |
| 3. court granted status quo on property pending suit. (Para 8) |
ORDER
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed seeking to set aside the order and decree dated 10.12.2024, made in IA No.2 of 2024 in OS No.796 of
2024 on the file of IV Additional District Judge, Coimbatore.
2. The appellant herein filed suit in OS No. 796 of 2014 on the file of the IV Additional District Judge, Coimbatore, against respondents herein( first respondent is her brother, respondents 2 to 4 are her sisters and fifth respondent is the Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Pollachi Branch), to cancel the relinquishment deed dated 25.10.2021, vide document No. 11069/2021, which said to be executed by the appellant and her sisters/respondent 2 to 4 in favour of the first respondent as Null and Void and also prayed to divide the suit schedule property into five equal shares along with other consequential relief.
While so, the appellant herein filed I.A No. 2 of 2024 in OS No. 796 of 2014 praying to grant an order of interim injunction, restraining the first responden
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
