IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.VADAMALAI, J
The Commissioner Paramakudi Municipality – Appellant
Versus
Kumaresan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of court procedures and evidence handling. (Para 1 , 10 , 15 , 23) |
| 2. dispute over property ownership and claims. (Para 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments regarding ownership and procedural disputes. (Para 8 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. decision outcomes and rationale. (Para 16 , 24) |
| 5. finality of the court's decision. (Para 25) |
JUDGMENT
This Second Appeal is filed against the judgment and decree, dated 19.02.2013 passed in A.S.No.17 of 2011 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Paramakudi, partly reversing the judgment and decree, dated 30.08.2010 passed in O.S.No.59 of 2008 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Paramakudi.
2. The appellant is the 4 defendant, the 1 respondent is the plaintiff and the respondents 2 to 4 are defendants 1 to 3 in O.S.No.59 of 2008 on the st file of District Munsif Court, Paramakudi. The 1 respondent/plaintiff filed the suit for declaration, recovery of possession and permanent injunction in respect of the suit property.
3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred as plaintiff and the defendants as arrayed in O.S.No.59 of 2008 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Paramakudi.
4. Case of the plaintiff (1 respondent herein):
The p


Thirumeni /v/ Arulmighu Vinayakar and Dhrowpathi Amman Temples Statues
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.