IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J
Mano @ Manavalan – Appellant
Versus
State represented by, The Inspector of Police, M-5, Ennore Police Station, Tiruvallur. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. request for expedited trial based on custody situation. (Para 2) |
| 2. guidance on exceptional circumstances for trial orders. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court directive for prompt trial resolution. (Para 6 , 7) |
O R D E R
This matter has been listed today under the caption “for being mentioned” at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. It is submitted that the present case was disposed of by this Court on 19.02.2026 with a direction to the IV Additional District and Sessions Court, Ponneri. However, in paragraph 2 of the order dated 19.02.2026, the petitioner, who is arrayed as A1, has been inadvertently described as 6th accused (A6).
3. In view of the above, the Registry is directed to carry out the necessary correction in paragraph 2 of the order dated 19.02.2026 by substituting the rank of the petitioner as “1st accused (A1)” in place of “6th accused (A6)” and thereafter, issue a fresh copy of the order.
13.03.2026 ham To
1. The IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ponneri.
2. The Inspector of Police, M-5, Ennore Police Station, Tiruvallur.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J .
ham
13.03.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATU
High Court Bar Association, Allahabad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.