SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 1943

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, K. SURENDER, JJ.
S.P. Thiyagarajan – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner, Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation – Respondent
W.A. No. 2551 of 2023
Decided On : 10-03-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : N. Manoharan
For the Respondents: N. Umapathi, P. Kumaresan, S. Suriya, T.R. Rajagopalan, V. Anantha Natarajan

The conversion of land designated for public purposes, such as parks or playgrounds, to private use is impermissible under the Town and Country Planning Act, emphasizing the local authority's duty to protect such areas for community benefit.

Headnote:(A) Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 - Section 56 and 57 - Writ proceedings against Resolution of Empowered Committee allowing the usage of land earmarked for public park and playground for educational purposes - Empowered Committee's resolution was challenged as it countered the original approved layout plans. (Paras 2, 6, 10, 16)

(B) Principle of Public Interest - Conversion of lands designated for public purposes is impermissible; local authorities are to maintain such lands as common areas for public benefit. (Paras 13, 18, 20)

(C) Procedures of the Empowered Committee - The decision-making structure if flawed cannot validly override statutory provisions requiring public interest considerations when altering designated land uses. (Paras 9, 18)

Facts of the case:
The appellant challenged a resolution from the Empowered Committee allowing the construction of a school on land designated for public park and playground, initially a private sale made by the 6th respondent contrary to municipal planning regulations. (Paras 2-5)

Findings of Court:
The court found the resolution of the Empowered Committee invalid as it contravened the Town and Country Planning Act, emphasizing the obligation to maintain public spaces. (Paras 21)

Issues: Whether the conversion of public land for private use was permissible and the validity of the Empowered Committee’s resolution. (Paras 12, 16)

Ratio Decidendi: The Court reiterated that conversions of lands meant for public use are impermissible without substantial public interest justification, and that local authorities cannot circumvent planning regulations by allowing such transformations. (Paras 13, 18)

Result: The resolution of the Empowered Committee and the preceding writ order were set aside and the matter remanded for proper consideration of legal standards and public interest. (Paras 21, 22)

Table of Content
1. land earmarked for public use cannot be converted (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. validity of empowered committee's decision questioned (Para 8 , 10 , 11)
3. legal precedent against conversion of public purpose land (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. locus standi for residents upheld in public interest (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
5. empowered committee's resolution set aside, remanded for fresh decision (Para 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT :

S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.

1. Under assail is the writ order dated 12.04.2022 passed in W.P.No.43824 of 2016.

2. The writ appellant has instituted the writ proceedings challenging the Resolution passed by the Empowered Committee in 33rd Empowered Committee meeting held on 30.08.2016 in Agenda No.26 and to direct the Commissioner, Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation to resume the land earmarked for park and playground in Nethaji Nagar Layout from the 6th respondent as per the eviction notice dated 10.03.1015.

3. The facts in brief would show that the 6th respondent Mr. Sachithananda Nageswaran purchased the subject land which is earmarked for park and playground in the year 1993 from the developer of an approved layout. It is not in dispute that as per the approved layout, the subject land has been earmarked for developing park and play ground by Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation. The said purchase of land was made for developing Home for aged people. However, the 6th respondent constructed a school and running the same for the past about 16 years. The appellant who is residing in the nearby location made a complaint stating that the park and playground area earmarked under the approved layout has been sold illegally and the 6th respondent has constructed a school building contrary to the layout approval as well as the provision of the Town and Country Planning Act. The complaint given by the appellant was considered by the District Collector and the certificate dated 04.04.2013 issued by the District Collector would read as follows:-

CERTIFICATE

The Siddar Gnana Padasal functioning in Coimbatore South Circle, Sundakkamuthur Vilalge, Siddar Gnana Peedam, Vivakudil, Kovaipudur has purchased the below mentioned Punjai land situated at Sundakkamuthur Village, Kovaipudur South circle, Coimbatore District. Serial Ka.Sa.No Extent in Sub Registrar of Madukkarai /

Through the Coimbatore, Kuniyamuthur town Panchayat File No.19813/88---Ma.Va.U.E.No.155/88 eh land purchased has been approved for development as a Layout. Among this 14418 Square feet (the 14418 square feet mentioned in the above mentioned Sl,No.1 to 4) this land has been allotted for Park and Playground.

4. Further representations submitted by the 6th respondent before the Member Secretary, Commissioner Local Planning Authority was considered and the Member Secretary has communicated a reply dated 02.08.2013, wherein he has reiterated that the proposed place has been earmarked for park and playground with Layout plan KA/T CP.No.155/88. It is not permissible to construct a school in the place reserved for park and playground. The said intimation resulted in approaching the Assistant Commissioner, South Zone, Coimbatore Corporation by the 6th respondent who in turn in his reply dated 28.01.2014 again reiterated that the subject school building built, operational and located at Coimbatore Municipality South Zone Kovaipudur, Sundakkamudur Village Survey No.117/2, 117 approved is meant for park and play area.

5. The Member Secretary, Coimbatore Town Planning Authority addressed a letter to the Commissioner, Town Planning Department on 22.12.2014, wherein, he made a finding that the physical inspection of the subject land has been made. The subject land earmarked as park and playground for the benefit of the public has been purchased and school building has been constructed and was functioning. He has reiterated that the application submitted regarding conversion of the park and playground earmarked for public usage is impermissible and consequential enforceme

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top