IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R. MAHADEVAN, V. PARTHIBAN, P.T. ASHA, JJ.
P. Karthikeyan & Others - Appellants
Versus
The Commissioner, Coimbatore Corporation Coimbatore & Others - Respondents
W.A. No. 4078 of 2019 & C.M.P. No. 25523 of 2019
Decided On : 07-10-2021
Constitution of India,1950 - Article 21 - Environment [Protection] Act, 1986 - Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 - Compost Yard - Park/children's play space - Earmarked - Writ petition was filed for issuance of a writ of mandamus to forbear Coimbatore Corporation from establishing Compost Yard in place earmarked for park/children's play space - Learned Single Judge, who dealt with rival contentions of parties, dismissed writ petition, by following Division Bench order dated rendered - Said Division Bench order is one of the decisions which came up for consideration before Hon'ble First Division Bench and was also reasons for present Reference before this Court - present writ appeal has been filed wherein it was contended on behalf of writ petitioners/appellants that decision of above Division Bench relied upon by learned Single Judge did not take into consideration certain provisions of Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 - Whether layout plan finalized as per provisions of Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 read with Development Control Rules framed thereunder, permits certain permissible deviations therefrom in larger public interest or not? – Held, In the considered view of Bench, implementation of SWM Rules, 2016, is not repugnant to any law or rules in force and it also is not affecting any public interest or any fundamental right of the citizens - right to have a free, clean environment include right to live in a clean neighbourhood, without garbage or solid waste - Policy implementation of solid waste management is thus oriented towards achieving above constitutional goal, aimed at promoting larger than any other public interest to stay almost with global outlook on subject- Rules also mandate local authorities and village panchayats of census towns and urban agglomeration to frame bye-laws incorporating same within one year from date of notification - Bench has not been informed whether as on date, any bye-laws have been framed as per SWM Rules, 2016 or not - In any event, as Court expressed Court reservation too, in regular upkeep and foolproof maintenance of Compost Yard, on ground, Court therefore, deem it fit to issue certain directions to authorities for proper implementation of SWM Rules, 2016, in letter and spirit as well - Reference is answered accordingly.
JUDGMENT :
V. Parthiban, J.
(Prayer: Writ Appeal preferred under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 30.08.2019 made in WP.No.23765/2019.)
GENESIS FOR THIS REFERENCE:-
1. The genesis of the present Reference before this Specially constituted Full Bench could be traced to the recent decision of the Hon'ble First Division Bench of this Court dated 07.02.2020 made in WA.No.4078 of 2019, wherein an issue was raised for adjudication in regard to utilisation of a portion of an area earmarked as playground, for installation of a Micro Bio Disposable Unit [Composting Centre] by the 1st respondent Corporation. The Hon'ble First Division Bench, while dealing with the issue, found that there were conflicting and divergent views expressed by the Division Benches of this Court and decided to refer the matter before a Larger Bench for an authoritative pronouncement in the matter as the uniform dispensation of justice is the hallmark of the justice delivery system.
2. While dealing with the reference, it was brought to the knowledge of this Bench that a Division Bench of this Court, vide it's order dated 14.03.2018 made in WP.No.32938 of 2017 [T.G. Ruthramani, Secretary, Poonamallee Nanbargal Nagar Veettu Manai Urimaiyalargal Nalasangam, Poonamallee Vs. Member Secretary, CMDA and others] has taken a view that location of Compost Centre in an area earmarked for playground/park, is permissible as such Centre being located for a larger public interest. Another Division Bench has taken similar views in W.P.No.18569 of 2018 dated 10.12.2018 [N. Shanmugham Vs. The District Collector, Tiruvallur District] and in WP.No.8048 of 2018 dated 11.12.2018 [E.S. Aadhithyan Vs. The District Collector, Kancheepuram].
3. On the other side of the spectrum, yet another Division Bench of this Court on 04.09.2018 has expressed a different view in a case reported in 2018 [5] CTC 857 [SIDCO Nagar Welfare Association represented by its Secretary Vs. CMDA and others]. All the decisions referred to above, have been rendered during the contemporaneous period in the year 2018.
4. In the above decisions of the learned Division Benches, several judgments have been relied upon in support of the respective views taken, with reference to various decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and other High Courts. The Hon'ble First Division Bench, noticing the conflicting legal standards laid down by the Division Benches and for resolving the divergent views, to bring about a certainty in the ruling of the Court in the subject matter, has placed the matter before the Hon'ble Chief Justice on the Administrative side for a Reference before a Larger Bench.
5. Pursuant thereto, this Bench has been constituted and a Reference has been made before this Bench for answering the reference as under:
6. The brief facts which gave rise to the filing of the present writ appeal, which triggered the larger controversy necessitating the present Reference before this Bench are stated hereunder.
7. Some residents of Thiru.Vi.Ka. Nagar, Vadavelli, Coimbatore, approached this Court in WP.No.23765 of 2019 questioning the Coimbatore Corporation from constructing the Compost Yard in the place earmarked for park/children's play area. The writ petition was filed for issuance of a writ of mandamus to forbear the Coimbatore Corporation from establishing the Compost Yard in the place earmarked for the park/children's play space. The learned Single Judge, who dealt with the rival contentions of the parties, dismissed the writ petition on 30.08.2019, by following the Division Bench order dated 14.03.2019 rendered in WP.No.32938 of 2017 [T.
Bangalore Medical Trust Vs. B.S. Muddappa
M.I. Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Radhey Shyam Sahu
PT.Chet ram Vashist Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Machavarapu Srinivasa Rao Vs. Vijayawada, Guntur, Tenali Mangalagiri Urban Development Authority
Dr. G.N. Khajuria Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Purushottam Vs. State of Karnataka
Kirubakaran Vs. The Commissioner (East), Corporation of Coimbatore
K. Rajamani Vs. Alamunagar Residents' Welfare Association
Sri Devi Nagar Residents Welfare Association Vs. Subbathal
Narmada Bachao Andolan vs. Union of India
G.N. Khajuria (Dr) v. Delhi Development Authority
Lal Bahadur v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
R. Chandran v. State of Tamil Nadu
Municipal Council, Ratlam v. Vardhichand
Francis Coralie Mullin v. Administrator, Union Territory of Delhi
Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation
State of H.P. v. Umed Ram Sharma
Vikram Deo Singh Tomar v. State of Bihar
T. Damodhar Rao v. Special Officer, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad
State of Bombay v. Laxmidas Ranchhoddas, AIR 1952 Bom 468
K. Ramadas Shenoy v. Town Municipal Council, Udipi
Virender Gaur v. State of Haryana
State of Bihar v. Kameshwar Singh
Balakrishna H. Sawant and others v. Sangli Miraj & Kupwad City Municipal Corporation and others
Raju S. Jethmalani and others v. State of Maharashtra and others
Consumer Education And Research Society v. Union of India
A.P. Pollution Control Board v. Prof. M.V. Nayudu
People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India
Ekta Shakti Foundation v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India
Jolly George Varghese v. Bank of Cochin
The conversion of land designated for public purposes, such as parks or playgrounds, to private use is impermissible under the Town and Country Planning Act, emphasizing the local authority's duty to....
The judgment establishes the principle that reserved open spaces in layouts cannot be used for any other purpose, emphasizing the public trust doctrine, the importance of preserving open spaces, and ....
Public lands designated for parks cannot be repurposed for commercial use without proper authority and procedural compliance, as dictated by urban planning laws.
Point of law : Section 46 of Act, it is the duty of the Gram Panchayat to provide certain amenities to the public and maintain them, such as construction of schools (clause iii), laying and maintenan....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that land reserved for public purpose in a layout cannot be used for any other purpose, and the authorities are obligated to maintain such open spa....
The main legal point established is that the reservation and preservation of open spaces for public parks and playgrounds is of great public concern and must be protected, as per the legislative inte....
Modification of land reserved for public purposes requires valid legal processes, including notification and consultation with affected parties, as determined by relevant sections of the Town Plannin....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.