Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. Srimathy, J
M. Chellameena – Appellant
Versus
P. Subbiah – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of the suit and the defendant's appeal context. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. discussion on the alleged sale agreement and notice issues leading to claims of a loan transaction. (Para 4 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's observations on the lack of proper notification to the defendant and related natural justice principles. (Para 6 , 9) |
| 4. order concerning the necessity of detailed reasoning in judgments and remanding the case for trial. (Para 12 , 19) |
| 5. final ruling allowing the revision petition and instructing for a denovo trial. (Para 20 , 21) |
ORDER
The present civil revision petition is filed by the defendant in the suit, appellant in the unnumbered Appeal Suit, petitioner in I.A.No.1780 of 2021 in Unnumbered A.S.No. of 2021 on the file of Principal District Court, Madurai against the fair and decreetal order dated 02.12.2022.
2.The plaintiff in the suit in the 1st respondent herein and the defendant in the suit is the revision petitioner. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred as plaintiff and defendant as per the ranking in the suit. The 2nd respondent is the subsequent purchaser of the suit property who had purchased the suit property after the disposal of I.A
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
