Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.Sathish Kumar, M.Jothiraman, JJ
Karungappan and Co Represented by Karungappan (Partner) – Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director / Project Director District Rural Development Agency (DRDA) Aranthangi Panchayat Union Pudukkottai District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. e-tender for refugee housing; technical bids rejected for missing physical documents. (Para 2 , 3 , 11) |
| 2. appellant contends unreasoned rejection, violation of tender clauses and cooling period. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 9) |
| 3. respondents justify non-responsiveness due to missing original affidavit per clause 9.3. (Para 7 , 8 , 15) |
| 4. no infirmity; appeals dismissed upholding bid rejection. (Para 10 , 18) |
| 5. tender clauses mandate physical submission; non-filing precludes evaluation. (Para 13 , 14 , 16 , 17) |
Under assail is the order passed in WP.(MD)Nos.31177, 29540, 31178, 31176, 31179, 31175 and 29467 of 2025 dated 12.02.2026.
2.The appellant herein is the writ petitioner/Class-1A contractor has challenged the rejection of technical bid dated 11.10.2025 with regard to the seven packages. It is the case of the writ petitioner that the first respondent/The Joint Director / Project Director, District Rural Development Agency (DRDA), Aranthangi Panchayat Union, Pudukkottai District had invited E-bid for construction of 132 houses for Sri Lankan refugees for 2025-2026 under two cover system for seven packages. The notification was issued on 19.09.2025. The last date for online
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
