Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.ANAND VENKATESH, SA
11.P.Megalarani – Appellant
Versus
1.Rajagopalan (died) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. court's analysis and observations on the will's validity (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 4. concluding judgment and order (Para 32 , 33) |
JUDGMENT The second appeal has been filed against the the judgment and decree in AS No.38 of 2006 dated 02.07.2007 on the file of the Principal District Court, Thanjavur reversing the judgment and decree passed in OS No.2 of 2002 dated 05.01.2006 on the file of the Sub Court, Pattukottai.
2. The defendants 2,4 and 9 are the appellants in the second appeal.
3. The first respondent/plaintiff filed a suit on the ground that the suit property originally belonged to one Manickam Chettiyar. He had two sons, viz., Kandasamy Chettiyar and Sambamoorthy Chettiyar. He settled the property in favour of his sons through a registered settlement deed dated 18.12.1901. The suit property was described as 'C' schedule first item in the settlement deed. The said Sambamoorthy Chettiyar died as a bachelor. Ultimately, one Kamalathammal inherited the propert
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
