Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P. Dhanabal, J
P. Jeevanantham – Appellant
Versus
P. Prabakaran – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the appeal and its context (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. description of the plaint and properties involved (Para 4) |
| 3. defendants' written statement and denial of ancestral property (Para 5) |
| 4. arguments of the appellant and analysis of trial court findings (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. courts' rationale regarding separate properties and evidences (Para 13 , 14) |
| 6. judicial interpretation of separate versus joint family property (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. response to substantial questions of law regarding property classification (Para 18 , 19) |
| 8. conclusion of the judgement and dismissal of the appeal (Para 20) |
JUDGMENT
This Second Appeal has been preferred as against the Decree and Judgment dated 31.10.2014 passed by First Additional District Court, Thirupur in A.S.No.13 of 2013.
2. The appellant is the plaintiff in the main suit filed in O.S.No.29 of 2011 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Udumalaipet, which was filed for the relief of partition and separate possession. The said suit was decreed by granting preliminary decree for 1/4th share to the plaintiff and aggrieved by the said decree and judgment, the 3rd defendant has preferred the Appeal Suit No.13 of 2013 on the file
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
