IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J
M/s.Shree Venkateshwara Bulllion – Appellant
Versus
The Principal Commissioner of Customs – Respondent
WMP Nos.14564 and 14565 of 2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. respondent agrees to evaluate cross-examination feasibility. (Para 2) |
| 2. petition disposed based on respondent's undertaking. (Para 3) |
PRAYER:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, forbearing the respondent from conducting any adjudication in ACC/ASST/MISC/53/2023-GR(I-4)-O/O PR COMMR-CUS-ACC-CHENNAI emanating out of Show Cause Notice No. 18 of 2023 dated 28.01.2023 issued in terms of sec. 28(4) of theCustoms Act, 1962read with Sec. 110AA of the without giving cross- Examination of the Witnesses whose statements are relied, officers of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence who conducted investigation and production of CCTV footage as demanded under interim reply dated 30.03.2023.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.Sathish Sundar For Respondent(s): M/s. Umesh Rao. K, Senior Standing Counsel
ORDER
The present Writ Petition is filed for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, forbearing the respondent from conducting any adjudication in ACC/ASST/MISC/53/2023-GR(I-4)-O/O PR COMMR-CUS-ACC-CHENNAI emanating out of Show Cause Notice No. 18 of 2023 dated 28.01.2023 issued in terms of sec. 28(4) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Sec. 110AA of the without giving cross-Examination of the Witnesses whose statements are relied, officers of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence who conducted investigation and production of CCTV footage as demanded under interim reply dated 30.03.2023.
2. Learned Senior Standing Counsel would submit a Memo which reads as follows:
MEMO
1. It is submitted that the Respondent has agreed to consider feasibility with respect to the request of the petitioner to cross examine certain persons.
2. It is submitted that the decision to grant or disallow cross-examination shall be evaluated on case- to-case basis within a stipulated/reasonable time frame.
3. It is further submitted that only after the determination of exercise in supra para 2 of this Memo, the Respondent will Adjudicate the SCN on merits.
3. In view thereof, nothing further may have to be adjudicated in this matter. Recording the same, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.