SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 34885

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J
M/s.Shree Venkateshwara Bulllion – Appellant
Versus
The Principal Commissioner of Customs – Respondent
WMP Nos.14564 and 14565 of 2023



Advocates:
For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.Sathish Sundar
For Respondent(s): M/s. Umesh Rao. K, Senior Standing Counsel

Adjudication deferred pending evaluation of cross-examination request in customs proceedings.

Headnote:Under Sections 28(4) and 110AA of the Customs Act, 1962, petitioner sought writ to restrain adjudication proceedings without cross-examination of witnesses, production of investigation officers, and CCTV footage as demanded in reply. Respondent filed memo agreeing to evaluate cross-examination request on case-to-case basis prior to merits adjudication. Court found respondent's undertaking sufficient, disposing petition without further adjudication. Issue framed as whether adjudication could proceed absent cross-examination rights under customs procedure. Ratio: Respondent's commitment to consider cross-examination feasibility within reasonable time before merits decision aligns with principles of natural justice. Writ petition disposed of, no order as to costs.

Table of Content
1. respondent agrees to evaluate cross-examination feasibility. (Para 2)
2. petition disposed based on respondent's undertaking. (Para 3)

PRAYER:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, forbearing the respondent from conducting any adjudication in ACC/ASST/MISC/53/2023-GR(I-4)-O/O PR COMMR-CUS-ACC-CHENNAI emanating out of Show Cause Notice No. 18 of 2023 dated 28.01.2023 issued in terms of sec. 28(4) of theCustoms Act, 1962read with Sec. 110AA of the without giving cross- Examination of the Witnesses whose statements are relied, officers of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence who conducted investigation and production of CCTV footage as demanded under interim reply dated 30.03.2023.

For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.Sathish Sundar For Respondent(s): M/s. Umesh Rao. K, Senior Standing Counsel

ORDER

The present Writ Petition is filed for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, forbearing the respondent from conducting any adjudication in ACC/ASST/MISC/53/2023-GR(I-4)-O/O PR COMMR-CUS-ACC-CHENNAI emanating out of Show Cause Notice No. 18 of 2023 dated 28.01.2023 issued in terms of sec. 28(4) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Sec. 110AA of the without giving cross-Examination of the Witnesses whose statements are relied, officers of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence who conducted investigation and production of CCTV footage as demanded under interim reply dated 30.03.2023.

2. Learned Senior Standing Counsel would submit a Memo which reads as follows:

MEMO

1. It is submitted that the Respondent has agreed to consider feasibility with respect to the request of the petitioner to cross examine certain persons.

2. It is submitted that the decision to grant or disallow cross-examination shall be evaluated on case- to-case basis within a stipulated/reasonable time frame.

3. It is further submitted that only after the determination of exercise in supra para 2 of this Memo, the Respondent will Adjudicate the SCN on merits.

3. In view thereof, nothing further may have to be adjudicated in this matter. Recording the same, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top