Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
N.ANAND VENKATESH, K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN
Senthamarai @ Senthamarai Selvi – Appellant
Versus
State through the Inspector of Police, Soolakkarai Police Station – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prosecution case: family property dispute leads to fatal attack. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. immediate medical response and fir registration post-incident. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. investigation, trial charges, and proceedings completion. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. defense challenges eyewitness reliability and incident genesis. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. prosecution upholds injured witness and corroborative evidence. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. injured eyewitness testimony holds higher credibility pedestal. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 7. reject unreliable pw3; hostile witnesses partially corroborate. (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 8. fir delay explained, not fatal to prosecution case. (Para 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 9. medical and forensic evidence corroborates ocular testimony. (Para 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 10. accused defenses rejected; trial court conviction upheld. (Para 44 , 45) |
| 11. appeals dismissed; sentences to be undergone. (Para 46) |
JUDGMENT :
N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.
1. These criminal appeals have been filed by A1 to A3 assailing the judgment passed in SC No.190 of 2017 dated 02.06.2023 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Virudhunagar
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
