Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J
Mr.Shekhar Mehta – Appellant
Versus
C.Baskar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of private complaint filing. (Para 2) |
| 2. petitioners argue procedural violation and no offence. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. respondent: petition premature; no cognizance taken. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. analysis of section 223 bnss on cognizance. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. supreme court: sworn statement not cognizance. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. no cognizance; petition dismissed, merits to magistrate. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
O R D E R
The present petition has been filed by accused Nos.2 to 4 in Crl.M.P.No.2684 of 202 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Karur seeking to quash the above said proceedings.
(A).Factual Background:
2.A perusal of the records reveal that the respondent herein had filed the above the said private complaint under Section 2 (1)(h) r/w Section 223 of BNSS to take the complaint on file as against the present petitioners for the offence punishable under Section 356 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ( Section 500 of I.P.C.). This complaint was lodged on 31.07.2025. The sworn statement of the complainant was recorded by the Court and a notice was issued to the petitioners herein for their appearance on 09.01.2026 enclosing the copy of the complaint and th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
