SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Anjan Moni Kalita, J.
Bhupendra Choudhury and Ors. – Petitioners
versus
Arun Choudhury and Anr. – Respondents
Criminal Petition.1126 of 2025 & Criminal Petition.1127 of 2025
Decided on 15.12.2025

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. B. Dutta, Senior Advocate, Mr. S. Deka, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. S. K. Poddar, Advocate

IMPORTANT POINT
Cognizance of offences – Notice is to be issued to accused only after examination of Complainant and present witnesses.

Headnote:

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 – Sections 223, 226 and 528 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 – Sections 303/324(4)/329(4)/3(5) – Cognizance of offences – Issuance of notice to accused prior to examination of Complainant and witnesses, is not what is mandated under Section 223(1) of BNSS, 2023 – What is mandated is notice to be issued to accused only after examination of Complainant and present witnesses – However, this is only when Magistrate does not want to exercise his powers under Section 226 of BNSS, 2023 – Such notice shall not be issued to accused before examination of Complainant and witnesses, for reason that in terms of Section 226 of BNSS, Magistrate/Court has power to dismiss Complaint on examination of Complainant and witnesses, on oath – In the event of exercising his power under Section 226 of BNSS, any prior notice to accused before examination of Complainant and witnesses, if any on oath, would be a futile exercise, uncalled for. (Paras 17 and 27)

Result:Criminal Petitions partly allowed.

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (CAV)

Heard Mr. B. Dutta, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. S. Deka, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners and Mr. S. K. Poddar, learned Counsel for the Respondent.

2. The instant Petition (Crl. Pet. 1126/ 2025) under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the Petitioners praying for quashing of the proceeding of C.R. Case No. 144/2025 pending before the JMFC, Morigaon under Sections 303/324(4)/329(4)/3(5) of BNSS, 2023. It would be relevant to mention herein that C.R. Case No. 144/2025 was registered on the basis of a complaint lodged by one Arun Choudhury (Respondent herein) against the Petitioners before the Court of JMFC, Morigaon.

3. A similar Petition being Crl. Pet. No. 1127/2025 has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 praying for quashing of the proceeding of C.R. Case No. 143/2025 pending before the JMFC, Morigaon under Section 303/324(4)/329(4)/3(5) of BNS. In this case also the C.R. Case No. 143/2025 was registered on the basis of a complaint lodged by one Shri Adhir Das (Respondent herein) against the Petitioners before the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Morigaon.

4. In both the aforesaid Crl. Petitions i.e. Crl. Pet. 1126/2025 and Crl. Pet. 1127/2025, the issues raised are same and both have been filed for quashing the respective aforesaid C.R. Cases pending before the JMFC, Morigaon on the basis of complaints filed by the respective Respondents against the Petitioners. Due to similar facts and allegations as well as issues involved in both the Crl. Petitions, both are tagged together and listed together for hearing. Therefore, both the Petitions were heard together and are being disposed of by the instant common Judgement & Order.

5. The facts of the cases involved in both the Petitions being same are summarized hereinbelow:

(i) In the year, 1949, the father of the Petitioner No. 1, namely, Bholanath Choudhury along with his two brothers, purchased a plot of land measuring twenty four (24) bigas approximately from one Bapuram Deka @ Koch and started residing in their respective plots. In front of the aforesaid land, there was an open field which was declared by the Government as VGR land and since 1949, the father of the Petitioner No.1 is in possession of that land without interruption. However, in the year, 1964, the father of the Petitioner No. 1 allowed the Petitioner No. 1 to take possession of the VGR land measuring 2 kathas 10 lechas situated at village Jargaon under Mayong Revenue Circle for fishery, cowsheds etc. Since then, the said land is under peaceful possession of the Petitioner No. 1.

(ii) In the year, 1967, the father of one Arun Choudhury, Respondent in Crl. Pet. 1126/2025, namely, Sri Nilakanta Choudhury who was the nephew of the father of the Petitioner No. 1, took shelter in the house of the father of Petitioner No. 1 and subsequently, he had given 1 bigha of VGR land under his possession to the said Nilakanta Choudhury i.e. the father of Arun Choudhury by the father of the Petitioner No.1. Later on, the Government settled the said land measuring 1 bigha in favour of the Respondent.

(iii) On 08.12.2024, when the Petitioner No. 1 went to his aforesaid land for development, the Respondent along with some other associates stopped him. As the Respondent along with some associates were trying to occupy the aforesaid land of the Petitioner No 1, the Petitioner No. 1 filed a petition under section 126 of BNSS, 2023 before the learned District Magistrate, Morigaon and accordingly, the District Magistrate, Morigaon directed the O.C. Jagiroad P.S. to submit a report. However, the same is yet to be submitted.

(iv) Faced with the aforesaid situation, Petitioner No. 1 filed a title suit, registered and numbered as Title Suit No. 16 of 2025 before the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Morigaon against the Respondent and his son and the same is still pending before the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Morigaon.Then on 22.06.2025, while

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top