Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.Velmurugan, K.Govindarajanthilakavadi, JJ
C.Saroja – Appellant
Versus
The Central Administrative Tribunal-Chennai Bench, Rep.by its Registrar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's service history and pay fixation errors. (Para 2) |
| 2. opposing arguments on group classification and recovery. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. rafiq masih prohibits belated recovery from group c employees. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. impugned order set aside; pay refixation directed. (Para 10 , 11) |
ORDER :
P.VELMURUGAN, J.
The petitioner has instituted the present Writ Petition assailing the order dated 02.03.2023 passed by the first respondent-Tribunal in O.A.No.589 of 2020 and seeking a consequential direction to the respondents to place her case before the Department of Expenditure for obtaining express approval for waiver, on par with the treatment extended to Shri Kannan, Stenographer Grade-I, Doordarshan, Chennai, under Office Memorandum dated 02.03.2016.
2. The petitioner was initially appointed as Stenographer Grade-III (Tamil) on 20.06.1992 in a temporary capacity. Subsequently, she was regularised and placed on probation for two years. Thereafter, she was granted the first financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme with effect from 15.06.2004, pursuant to which, her designation was upgraded to Stenographer Grade II. By notification dated 07.12.2017, the post of Stenog
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
