Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V. Lakshminarayanan, J
Rajakumari – Appellant
Versus
Murugan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of ejectment suit and execution proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. landlord's contention on limited challenge scope. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 3. no stay in appeal defers execution. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. dismiss revision, direct immediate execution. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
ORDER
The tenant is the civil revision petitioner.
2.O.S.No.77 of 1996 is a suit for ejectment. This suit, after contest, was decreed by the learned Principal District Munsif at Kuzhithurai on 05.05.2017. Aggrieved by the same, the tenant preferred a regular appeal before the learned Subordinate Judge at Kuzhithurai. The First Appeal too, came to be dismissed. Aggrieved by the concurrent judgments ordering eviction, the tenant states that he preferred a second appeal before this Court in S.A.(MD) No.413 of
2025.
3.In the meantime, the landlord/plaintiff/decree holder presented E.P.No.38 of 2021 to take possession of the property. In the said proceedings, the tenant/civil revision petitioner/judgment debtor was served. He remained ex parte. After the EP had been languishing for a period of four years, by an order dated 30.04.2025, the learned Executing Judge granted an order to break open of locks and for police
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
