Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.ANAND VENKATESH, K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, JJ
Arunachalam @ Mottaiyandi – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. father repeatedly assaulted daughter under false medical pretext. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. investigation, evidence collection, and trial proceedings completed. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. appellant contends false implication and delayed complaint. (Para 12) |
| 4. victim's credible testimony corroborated by documents and medical evidence. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. reliable victim testimony in sexual assault needs no corroboration. (Para 18) |
| 6. life imprisonment upheld for aggravated assault on daughter. (Para 19 , 21) |
JUDGMENT :
N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.
1. The sole accused has assailed the judgment of the Sessions Judge, Special Court for POCSO Act cases, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur in SC No.11 of 2020 dated 16.12.2022, wherein, the appellant has been convicted and sentenced in the following manner:
The sentences were ordered to run concurrently.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the appellant had already committed an offence under Section 302 and he was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for life. He underwent sentence for nearly 16 years and thereafter he was released and he joined his family. On 09.12.2018 at about 9.30 p.m., he approached the victim girl
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
